Re: [E-devel] Line + width support.

2008-07-26 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 20 May 2008 10:14:48 -0300 Diego Bitencourt Contezini [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: hmm. i'd rather hold here in favor of a much more... expansive set of vgfx support... and nail this kind of thing all in one shot. We decided to improve the line implementation to speed up the use of

Re: [E-devel] Line + width support.

2008-05-20 Thread Diego Bitencourt Contezini
We decided to improve the line implementation to speed up the use of evas-lines in python (our case). Yes, we could just use polygons, but we are trying to reduce processor usage at this point. Its faster to draw lines (with lines implementation) directly, specially dealing with

Re: [E-devel] Line + width support.

2008-05-20 Thread Diego Bitencourt Contezini
This patches I sent last mail are the last working, sorry, I forgot to tell. They are with two corrections we've got here in testing. Diego - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R)

Re: [E-devel] Line + width support.

2008-05-20 Thread Jose Gonzalez
Diego wrote: We decided to improve the line implementation to speed up the use of evas-lines in python (our case). Yes, we could just use polygons, but we are trying to reduce processor usage at this point. Its faster to draw lines (with lines implementation) directly, specially dealing

Re: [E-devel] Line + width support.

2008-05-18 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:20:27 -0300 Diego Bitencourt Contezini [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: any reason you didnt just use polygons? :) Hello all. Working with evas+Lines in python, is fast. But if you need a line with more then one pixel of width, it gets very slow (in dispositives like N800),

Re: [E-devel] Line + width support.

2008-05-16 Thread Adriano Rezende
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Diego Bitencourt Contezini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all. Working with evas+Lines in python, is fast. But if you need a line with more then one pixel of width, it gets

Re: [E-devel] Line + width support.

2008-05-16 Thread Adriano Rezende
Hi Diego, Forget about the API break, my mistake. As soon as I have time will take a look more deeply and test some benchmarks. BR, Adriano On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Adriano Rezende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[E-devel] Line + width support.

2008-05-13 Thread Diego Bitencourt Contezini
Hello all. Working with evas+Lines in python, is fast. But if you need a line with more then one pixel of width, it gets very slow (in dispositives like N800), because object Line dont have width support, so its needen to use Rectangles to make it works. I made a modification to support width in

Re: [E-devel] Line + width support.

2008-05-13 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Diego Bitencourt Contezini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all. Working with evas+Lines in python, is fast. But if you need a line with more then one pixel of width, it gets very slow (in dispositives like N800), because object Line dont have width support,