Thanks for all the answers. The way I solved it was to add a normal
rectangle with the blend op just below the copy rectangle with the same size
and with alpha=255.
/Mikael
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Jose Gonzalez jose_...@juno.com wrote:
Carsten wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:20:22
Hi, does the 'obscuring objects'-thing work with smart objects?
When I have an opaque rectangle in a smart object (render copy op)
objects behind it are still rendered. I have a rather old snapshot of efl
from 2008
so maybe this has been fixed in a later revision?
/Mikael
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 00:59:36 -0800 Mikael Liljeroth mikael.liljer...@gmail.com
said:
Hi, does the 'obscuring objects'-thing work with smart objects?
When I have an opaque rectangle in a smart object (render copy op)
objects behind it are still rendered. I have a rather old snapshot of efl
from
Ok. The reason for the copy op is that I want an area of the output
with a particular color and alpha value since I'm blending the entire output
later on with other graphics (not using evas), like a cutout effect.
Therefore
I do not want to render things behind the cutout rectangle. Is this
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:20:22 -0800 Mikael Liljeroth mikael.liljer...@gmail.com
said:
Ok. The reason for the copy op is that I want an area of the output
with a particular color and alpha value since I'm blending the entire output
later on with other graphics (not using evas), like a cutout
Carsten wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:20:22 -0800 Mikael Liljeroth
mikael.liljer...@gmail.com
said:
Ok. The reason for the copy op is that I want an area of the output
with a particular color and alpha value since I'm blending the entire output
later on with other graphics (not
