On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:43:13 +0200 "Hendrik Siedelmann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
just fyi - it's slipped int svn in the meantime :)
> Did I post this in some wrong form? I can't believe there's no one
> interested in this. I thought this was asked for before, but it doesnt
> look like it. I'd
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Hendrik Siedelmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/6 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Hendrik Siedelmann
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> - default behaviour is like before, BUT epsilon_exists will also find
>>
2008/10/6 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Hendrik Siedelmann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Okay here it is, this patch adds the possibility to epsilon to create
>> thumbnails in jpg format. The thumbnails are saved in FDO naming
>> convention, just
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Hendrik Siedelmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay here it is, this patch adds the possibility to epsilon to create
> thumbnails in jpg format. The thumbnails are saved in FDO naming
> convention, just with ending .jpg. Would be glad if you could give me
> some fe
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Hendrik Siedelmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/4 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Hendrik Siedelmann
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Did I post this in some wrong form? I can't believe there's no one
>>> int
2008/10/4 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Hendrik Siedelmann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Did I post this in some wrong form? I can't believe there's no one
>> interested in this. I thought this was asked for before, but it doesnt
>> look like it.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Hendrik Siedelmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did I post this in some wrong form? I can't believe there's no one
> interested in this. I thought this was asked for before, but it doesnt
> look like it. I'd be happy to get any feedback, even if only to know
> why m
Did I post this in some wrong form? I can't believe there's no one
interested in this. I thought this was asked for before, but it doesnt
look like it. I'd be happy to get any feedback, even if only to know
why my patch was completely ignored.
I'm refering to my mail from 21 Sep 2008:
>Okay here i
Okay here it is, this patch adds the possibility to epsilon to create
thumbnails in jpg format. The thumbnails are saved in FDO naming
convention, just with ending .jpg. Would be glad if you could give me
some feedback so this could eventually be included in svn. Patch works
for me, but there are s
