On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:00:54 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:44:22 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:25:34 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> > > On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:44:22 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:25:34 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> > On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:26:17 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > you n
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:25:34 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:26:17 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > you need to add the concept of ecore objects. then being able to
> > attach things to the ecore objects - that incl
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:26:17 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you need to add the concept of ecore objects. then being able to
> attach things to the ecore objects - that includes keepign the
> callback handler list within the object, not in the global list. so
>
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:49:05 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> There was a small discussion after I voiced my opinion about the ecore
> event system. As can be expected, some one suggested I submit a patch.
> This is not a patch, but a statement of the problem and two proposed
> s
There was a small discussion after I voiced my opinion about the ecore
event system. As can be expected, some one suggested I submit a patch.
This is not a patch, but a statement of the problem and two proposed
solutions. I'll write either solution.
My comments where prompted by someone suggesti
