Re: [E-devel] Re: Eterm's latest patch

2005-05-04 Thread Michael Jennings
On Wednesday, 27 April 2005, at 18:33:29 (-0400), Mike Frysinger wrote: > uhh, no, but most people would never notice :P > > build = machine the package is *building on* > host = machine the package will *run on* > target = machine the package will *generate code for* Okay, I had host and target

Re: [E-devel] Re: Eterm's latest patch

2005-04-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 02:49 pm, Michael Jennings wrote: > Except that for cross-compiling you'll need to check $target_cpu, not > $host_cpu. uhh, no, but most people would never notice :P build = machine the package is *building on* host = machine the package will *run on* target = machine t

Re: [E-devel] Re: Eterm's latest patch

2005-04-27 Thread Michael Jennings
On Tuesday, 26 April 2005, at 17:51:17 (-0600), John Slaten wrote: > Check out the imlib2 configure: > case $target_cpu in > i*86) > ; > x64_64) > ; > esac That's pretty much it, thanks. On Tuesday, 26 April 2005, at 20:07:59 (-0400), Mike Frysinger wrote: > if you add AC_CANONIC

Re: [E-devel] Re: Eterm's latest patch

2005-04-26 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 07:42 pm, Tres Melton wrote: > Please take note of how the mmx_cmod.S file is never > assemble if ./configure is invoked with --disable-mmx. We are trying to > do that automatically. i was idling reading the thread, wasnt quite sure what you needed ... if you add AC_CANO

Re: [E-devel] Re: Eterm's latest patch

2005-04-26 Thread John Slaten
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 17:08 -0600, Tres Melton wrote: > The reply to the top half of the email (deleted) is in another email to > the list. > > On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 12:00 -0400, Michael Jennings wrote: > > > Another issue that needs to get resolved in the ./configure script > > > is that it enabl

Re: [E-devel] Re: Eterm's latest patch

2005-04-26 Thread Tres Melton
vapier, The C code is not the issue. The problem is that we want the ./configure script to automatically detect an x86_64 platform and disable the MMX extensions. There are a couple of places in pixmap.c where your suggestion will work but it will miss the fact that we want the Makefile t

Re: [E-devel] Re: Eterm's latest patch

2005-04-26 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 07:08 pm, Tres Melton wrote: > On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 12:00 -0400, Michael Jennings wrote: > > > Another issue that needs to get resolved in the ./configure script > > > is that it enables MMX on my AMD64. That's fine, I have MMX, but > > > the code in mmx_cmod.S is not com

Re: [E-devel] Re: Eterm's latest patch

2005-04-26 Thread Tres Melton
The reply to the top half of the email (deleted) is in another email to the list. On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 12:00 -0400, Michael Jennings wrote: > > Another issue that needs to get resolved in the ./configure script > > is that it enables MMX on my AMD64. That's fine, I have MMX, but > > the code in

[E-devel] Re: Eterm's latest patch

2005-04-26 Thread Michael Jennings
On Monday, 25 April 2005, at 19:06:16 (-0600), Tres Melton wrote: > This appears to work because it is an off by one error (one pixel = > 4 bytes). It will fail to adjust the top left pixel of the image > map and will go one pixel past the end of the image array at the > bottom right. This is a

[E-devel] Re: Eterm's latest patch

2005-04-25 Thread Tres Melton
Hi Everybody, My name is Tres and I have been invited to join the E/Eterm development list by MeJ after sending him an email regarding the last patch to Eterm. The patch is designed to remove that horrible blue acid trip effect that has plagued some of us. I have left the original email