Re: [E-devel] Rendering Differences with and without Composite module

2014-01-24 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 00:04:13 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:40:17 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz > said: > > > On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:33:24 -0500 > > Chris Seekamp wrote: > > > > > I am working on Bodhi on Samsung Chromebook (ARM). I have noticed a > > > s

Re: [E-devel] Rendering Differences with and without Composite module

2014-01-24 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:40:17 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz said: > On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:33:24 -0500 > Chris Seekamp wrote: > > > I am working on Bodhi on Samsung Chromebook (ARM). I have noticed a > > significant difference in the behavior of the es2gears testing program > > when the Composite

Re: [E-devel] Rendering Differences with and without Composite module

2014-01-24 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:33:24 -0500 Chris Seekamp said: this is indicative of problems with the driver. you have seemingly es2gears blasting to the framebuffer and/or the same pixmap buffer the root window lives in for starters as opposed to sticking to its own pixmap buffer. this is all out of t

Re: [E-devel] Rendering Differences with and without Composite module

2014-01-24 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:33:24 -0500 Chris Seekamp wrote: > I am working on Bodhi on Samsung Chromebook (ARM). I have noticed a > significant difference in the behavior of the es2gears testing program > when the Composite module is loaded and when it isn't. I am using the > Mali T604 graphics u