Hello.
On 17/06/16 08:06, Simon Lees wrote:
>
> On 06/16/2016 07:16 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 16/06/16 03:34, Simon Lees wrote:
>>> On 06/12/2016 09:11 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
I put together a tarball snapshot with what we had on Friday (did not
writ
Hello.
On 17/06/16 08:06, Simon Lees wrote:
>
> On 06/16/2016 07:16 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 16/06/16 03:34, Simon Lees wrote:
>>> On 06/12/2016 09:11 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
I put together a tarball snapshot with what we had on Friday (did not
writ
On 06/16/2016 07:16 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 16/06/16 03:34, Simon Lees wrote:
>>
>> On 06/12/2016 09:11 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I put together a tarball snapshot with what we had on Friday (did not
>>> write here as our servers had been overloaded at that p
Hello.
On 16/06/16 03:34, Simon Lees wrote:
>
> On 06/12/2016 09:11 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I put together a tarball snapshot with what we had on Friday (did not
>> write here as our servers had been overloaded at that point).
>>
>> While we have not been ready for an alpha relea
On 06/12/2016 09:11 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I put together a tarball snapshot with what we had on Friday (did not
> write here as our servers had been overloaded at that point).
>
> While we have not been ready for an alpha release I found it useful to
> get at least a snapshot
Hello.
I put together a tarball snapshot with what we had on Friday (did not
write here as our servers had been overloaded at that point).
While we have not been ready for an alpha release I found it useful to
get at least a snapshot out to allow packagers testing the many changes
we did regar
