On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Sun, 15 May 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Vincent Torri
>> wrote:
>>> some questions:
>>>
>>> * is it normal that in eina_condition_free(), the mutex is not destroyed
>>> ?
>>
>> Yes. It's only a link to
On Sun, 15 May 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
some questions:
* is it normal that in eina_condition_free(), the mutex is not destroyed ?
Yes. It's only a link to the real mutex, not a copy. I am thinking
about adding refcounting in debug m
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> some questions:
>
> * is it normal that in eina_condition_free(), the mutex is not destroyed ?
Yes. It's only a link to the real mutex, not a copy. I am thinking
about adding refcounting in debug mode to be sure that mutex still
exist and
some questions:
* is it normal that in eina_condition_free(), the mutex is not destroyed ?
* in eina_lock_take()
#ifdef EINA_HAVE_ON_OFF_THREADS
if (!_eina_threads_activated)
{
#ifdef EINA_HAVE_DEBUG_THREADS
assert(pthread_equal(_eina_main_loop, pthread_self()));
#endif
