On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:00:10 +0200 Simon TRENY [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
i am still tossing up if the smart move method should be there, or all child
objects should be simply placed rlative to the smart parent's origin and thus
moved automatically, or if i should provide a default move
i am still tossing up if the smart move method should be there, or all child
objects should be simply placed rlative to the smart parent's origin and thus
moved automatically, or if i should provide a default move method that does
this for you. right now its save from destruction - but i'm
I think you mentioned this on IRC, but this should help address some of
the recursive clipping recalculation overhead that we've been seeing,
right?On 10/26/05, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK everyone - developer beings and such.as was brought up on the mailing lists
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:25:12 +0900 Carsten writes:
OK everyone - developer beings and such.
as was brought up on the mailing lists several months ago,
i have (FINALLY!) started some work on cleaning/rationalising
and improving eva's smart object code and interfaces.
And there is
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:48:14 -0500 Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
I think you mentioned this on IRC, but this should help address some of the
recursive clipping recalculation overhead that we've been seeing, right?
not my first steps - but later on - yes.
On 10/26/05, The
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:42:48 -0400 Jose O Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:25:12 +0900 Carsten writes:
OK everyone - developer beings and such.
as was brought up on the mailing lists several months ago,
i have (FINALLY!) started some work on
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:33:05 +0900 Carsten writes:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:42:48 -0400 Jose O Gonzalez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:25:12 +0900 Carsten writes:
OK everyone - developer beings and such.
as was brought up on the mailing lists several
