Re: [E-devel] e17 segv on DNS repair

2008-09-20 Thread Viktor Kojouharov
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 17:48 -0400, Tony Lill wrote: > I can fairly reliably crash e17 in the following manner: > > Disable DNS eg. by renaming resolv.conf > Reboot the box > Login to an e17 session > Repair DNS > wait a few seconds. > > I also get lots of segv's if I am on a less than reliable wi

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv on DNS repair

2008-09-20 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Tony Lill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can fairly reliably crash e17 in the following manner: > > Disable DNS eg. by renaming resolv.conf > Reboot the box > Login to an e17 session > Repair DNS > wait a few seconds. > > I also get lots of segv's if I am on a less

[E-devel] e17 segv on DNS repair

2008-09-20 Thread Tony Lill
I can fairly reliably crash e17 in the following manner: Disable DNS eg. by renaming resolv.conf Reboot the box Login to an e17 session Repair DNS wait a few seconds. I also get lots of segv's if I am on a less than reliable wireless connection. I'll try and get a core file, but my system is not

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-11-30 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:40:15 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > jochen wrote: > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > >>On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:55:37 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>babbled: > >> > >> > >> > >>>OK, I just rebuild all of EFL and E with the above flags and th

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-24 Thread Massimo Maiurana
jochen, il 24/10/2005 02:31, scrisse: > EDJE ERROR: An element in file > /usr/share/enlightenment/data/themes/default.edj, group > widgets/menu/default/icon has a non expandable > part not marked as fixed size in one dimension. This needs > to be fixed in the source .edc by adding: > fixed: 1

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-21 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:19:46 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:55:37 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > babbled: > > > > > >>OK, I just rebuild all of EFL and E with the above flags and the error > >>is gone, so it se

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-21 Thread jochen
jochen wrote: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >>On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:55:37 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: >> >> >> >>>OK, I just rebuild all of EFL and E with the above flags and the error >>>is gone, so it seems it was a optimization bug, and I thought I was >>>conservati

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-21 Thread jochen
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:55:37 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > >>OK, I just rebuild all of EFL and E with the above flags and the error >>is gone, so it seems it was a optimization bug, and I thought I was >>conservative with the optimization.

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-21 Thread David Seikel
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 15:30:54 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Seikel wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:20:03 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'll be busy with the witch 1 hunt on the weekend. But since I have > > lots of distros here, I

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-21 Thread jochen
jochen wrote: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >>On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:55:37 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: >> >> >> >>>OK, I just rebuild all of EFL and E with the above flags and the error >>>is gone, so it seems it was a optimization bug, and I thought I was >>>conservati

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-21 Thread jochen
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:55:37 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > >>OK, I just rebuild all of EFL and E with the above flags and the error >>is gone, so it seems it was a optimization bug, and I thought I was >>conservative with the optimization.

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-21 Thread jochen
David Seikel wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:20:03 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>AARGH!! and now its gone? what version of gcc do you use? >>personalyl i compile everything (in efl) with these cflags: -O2 >>-march=pentium4 -g -msse -mmmx -pipe >> >>

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-21 Thread jochen
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:55:37 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > >>OK, I just rebuild all of EFL and E with the above flags and the error >>is gone, so it seems it was a optimization bug, and I thought I was >>conservative with the optimization.

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-20 Thread David Seikel
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:20:03 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AARGH!! and now its gone? what version of gcc do you use? > personalyl i compile everything (in efl) with these cflags: -O2 > -march=pentium4 -g -msse -mmmx -pipe > > on my p4 boxes, and > -O2 -ma

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:55:37 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > OK, I just rebuild all of EFL and E with the above flags and the error > is gone, so it seems it was a optimization bug, and I thought I was > conservative with the optimization. Thanks for the explanations. Well if > I find

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-20 Thread jochen
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:09:25 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > >>Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:40:43 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:09:25 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:40:43 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > > >>On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:16:49 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-19 Thread jochen
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:40:43 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > >>On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:16:49 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>babbled: >> >> >>>Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:40:43 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:16:49 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > babbled: > > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:37:41 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > babbl

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:16:49 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:37:41 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > babbled: > > > > > >>Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >> > >>>On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:13:40 +1300 jochen

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-19 Thread jochen
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:37:41 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > >>Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:13:40 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>babbled: >>> >>> >>> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >>

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-18 Thread jochen
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:37:41 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > >>Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:13:40 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>babbled: >>> >>> >>> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >>

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-18 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:37:41 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:13:40 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > babbled: > > > > > >>Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >> > >>>On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:30:16 +1300 jochen

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-18 Thread jochen
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:13:40 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > >>Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:30:16 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>babbled: >>> >>> >>> jochen wrote: >Hi guys,

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-18 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:13:40 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:30:16 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > babbled: > > > > > >>jochen wrote: > >> > >>>Hi guys, > >>>I'm have another segfault. CVS of today. It happens wh

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-18 Thread jochen
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:30:16 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > >>jochen wrote: >> >>>Hi guys, >>>I'm have another segfault. CVS of today. It happens when I close an >>>eterm with alt-right -> close. happens every time. Closing with >>>ctrl-alt

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-18 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:30:16 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > jochen wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I'm have another segfault. CVS of today. It happens when I close an > > eterm with alt-right -> close. happens every time. Closing with > > ctrl-alt-x or the close button works however. and it s

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-17 Thread jochen
jochen wrote: > Hi guys, > I'm have another segfault. CVS of today. It happens when I close an > eterm with alt-right -> close. happens every time. Closing with > ctrl-alt-x or the close button works however. and it seems to only > happen with eterm of the apps I tried. Here is the backtrace > Chee

[E-devel] e17 segv

2005-10-17 Thread jochen
Hi guys, I'm have another segfault. CVS of today. It happens when I close an eterm with alt-right -> close. happens every time. Closing with ctrl-alt-x or the close button works however. and it seems to only happen with eterm of the apps I tried. Here is the backtrace Cheers Jochen #0 0xe410 i

Re: [E-devel] e17 segv

2005-09-27 Thread jochen
jochen wrote: > Hi > just had a segv, can't reproduce it, I was working with gnomebaker when > it happened. cvs is of today I have the monitor and engage modules > enabled, I'll disable them and if it happens again let you know. Anyway > here is the backtrace > cheers > Jochen > > > -

[E-devel] e17 segv

2005-09-27 Thread jochen
Hi just had a segv, can't reproduce it, I was working with gnomebaker when it happened. cvs is of today I have the monitor and engage modules enabled, I'll disable them and if it happens again let you know. Anyway here is the backtrace cheers Jochen #0 0xe410 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7d5