Re: [E-devel] ecore_xcb proposal - part 2

2008-01-02 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Nathan Ingersoll wrote: > I think this looks very reasonable. Were you able to verify with the > XCB devs that we can poll on the cookies like this? They didn't answer me yet. Maybe they are on holydays :) Vincent > On Dec 31, 2007 10:25 AM, Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [E-devel] ecore_xcb proposal - part 2

2008-01-02 Thread Nathan Ingersoll
I think this looks very reasonable. Were you able to verify with the XCB devs that we can poll on the cookies like this? On Dec 31, 2007 10:25 AM, Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Nathan Ingersoll wrote: > > >> Another possibility (raster's idea) for > >> ecore

Re: [E-devel] ecore_xcb proposal - part 2

2007-12-31 Thread Vincent Torri
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Nathan Ingersoll wrote: >> Another possibility (raster's idea) for >> ecore_x_drawable_geometry_get_async is to sent an event >> ECORE_X_REPLY_GEOMETRY_GET just when the xcb_get_geometry_reply call has >> returned. The event would contain (actually, would be) the structure >

Re: [E-devel] ecore_xcb proposal - part 2

2007-12-29 Thread Nathan Ingersoll
On Jul 14, 2007 11:27 AM, Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Vincent Torri wrote: > > Proposal #2: > > If XCB is found: > > * If a request does not need a reply, the function is just a translation > of the Xlib code. Nothing much to say. Agreed so far. >

Re: [E-devel] ecore_xcb proposal

2007-12-29 Thread Nathan Ingersoll
On Jun 20, 2007 11:58 PM, Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey, > > Here is a suggestion of a new ecore_xcb api, according to all the remarks > I have noted. > > Currently: > > * ecore_x_* functions use Xlib code if XCB is not found, otherwise use > XCB code. In the latter case, one h

[E-devel] ecore_xcb proposal - part 2

2007-07-14 Thread Vincent Torri
Hey On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Vincent Torri wrote: > Here is a suggestion of a new ecore_xcb api, according to all the remarks I > have noted. > > Currently: > > * ecore_x_* functions use Xlib code if XCB is not found, otherwise use XCB > code. In the latter case, one has to use 2 other functions (

[E-devel] ecore_xcb proposal

2007-06-20 Thread Vincent Torri
Hey, Here is a suggestion of a new ecore_xcb api, according to all the remarks I have noted. Currently: * ecore_x_* functions use Xlib code if XCB is not found, otherwise use XCB code. In the latter case, one has to use 2 other functions (*_prefetch and *_fetch functions) to remove roundtr