the infamous #ifndef
EO_IS_UNDER_DEVELOPMENT_AND_API_WILL_CHANGE_AND_I_KNOW_ABOUT_THAT;
#error "Eo is under development and API will change"; #endif should
help. I don't mind the actual libname/release it we make sure the code
is aware of that.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
>> wrote:
>>> sure, but it sounds more like "pre-alpha" than beta at this point
>>> considering the amount of rewrite occurring.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
>> sure, but it sounds more like "pre-alpha" than beta at this point
>> considering the amount of rewrite occurring.
>
> There is still no agreement about if we are going to change
On 23/07/13 08:46, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As the time comes, we are trying to move to a time based release. But
> as the discussion on Eo does show, it takes time to reach a consensus
> on some API and make it difficult to move forward on a release.
>
> So I have introduced a macro EFL_BET
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> sure, but it sounds more like "pre-alpha" than beta at this point
> considering the amount of rewrite occurring.
There is still no agreement about if we are going to change any of the
existing API or not. It is still a discussion. And
sure, but it sounds more like "pre-alpha" than beta at this point
considering the amount of rewrite occurring.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
> > I don't understand why we can't just remove all those from the
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> I don't understand why we can't just remove all those from the public
> headers. If we're still rewriting them so much that they need to be marked
> as beta, they should not be released at all imo.
Because we use it. That's the point.
I don't understand why we can't just remove all those from the public
headers. If we're still rewriting them so much that they need to be marked
as beta, they should not be released at all imo.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As the time comes, we are trying to m
Hello,
As the time comes, we are trying to move to a time based release. But
as the discussion on Eo does show, it takes time to reach a consensus
on some API and make it difficult to move forward on a release.
So I have introduced a macro EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT that is used to
disable API that we
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> ok - i'm cutting an efl beta today. i know. it's a week overdue.
just a note on the Windows side: I'm fixing that AltGr problem this
evening. The keyboard status on Windows will not be bad, but it still has
bugs
Vincent
>
> --
ok - i'm cutting an efl beta today. i know. it's a week overdue.
--
- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[email protected]
--
All the data conti
: [email protected]
Sent: 11-11-25(금) 23:08:17
Subject: Re: [E-devel] efl beta?
2011/11/25 Michael Blumenkrantz <[email protected]>:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 17:44:14 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 25 Nov
2011/11/25 Michael Blumenkrantz :
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 17:44:14 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:50:56 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo
>> said:
>>
>> that's what i saw.. but no explanation if it was a bug at all and what fixed
>> it?
>>
>> > mouse event of elm_
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 17:44:14 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:50:56 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo
> said:
>
> that's what i saw.. but no explanation if it was a bug at all and what fixed
> it?
>
> > mouse event of elm_pager issue looks fixed by accident.
> > is
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> ok - some of the worst bugs have been dealt with now for alpha. i'm now
> asking:
>
> what pending issues do we have now. cedric mumbled about some CURRENT
> transition issue.
Sadly I wont have enough time to commit a working solution th
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:50:56 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo
said:
that's what i saw.. but no explanation if it was a bug at all and what fixed it?
> mouse event of elm_pager issue looks fixed by accident.
> is this right?
> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/65551
>
> Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
>
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:47:04 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:37:00 +1000 David Seikel
> said:
>
> > On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:18:01 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > ok - some of the worst bugs have been dealt with now for alpha.
>
mouse event of elm_pager issue looks fixed by accident.
is this right?
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/65551
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
>> ok - some of the worst bug
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> ok - some of the worst bugs have been dealt with now for alpha. i'm now
> asking:
>
> what pending issues do we have now. cedric mumbled about some CURRENT
> transition issue. mikez was mumbling about elm pager + mouse in and out
>
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:37:00 +1000 David Seikel said:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:18:01 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> wrote:
>
> > ok - some of the worst bugs have been dealt with now for alpha. i'm
> > now asking:
> >
> > what pending issues do we have now. cedric mumbled about some C
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:18:01 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> ok - some of the worst bugs have been dealt with now for alpha. i'm
> now asking:
>
> what pending issues do we have now. cedric mumbled about some CURRENT
> transition issue. mikez was mumbling about elm pager + mouse
ok - some of the worst bugs have been dealt with now for alpha. i'm now asking:
what pending issues do we have now. cedric mumbled about some CURRENT
transition issue. mikez was mumbling about elm pager + mouse in and out issues?
there are some more ecore_win32/ce patches on the list - vincent. wh
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 08:52:04 +1000
David Seikel wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 18:35:07 -0400 Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 21:02:52 +0900
> > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >
> > > ok - now the ssl stuff for ecore_con is done - i finished up the
> > > ecore_x_
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 18:35:07 -0400 Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 21:02:52 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > ok - now the ssl stuff for ecore_con is done - i finished up the
> > ecore_x_image api that was incomplete and did some more cleaning
> > and bugfixi
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 21:02:52 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> ok - now the ssl stuff for ecore_con is done - i finished up the ecore_x_image
> api that was incomplete and did some more cleaning and bugfixing - i think
> we're ready for 1.0 beta for efl. any objections/input? i'm thi
Em 02-10-2010 13:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) escreveu:
> ok - now the ssl stuff for ecore_con is done - i finished up the ecore_x_image
> api that was incomplete and did some more cleaning and bugfixing - i think
> we're ready for 1.0 beta for efl. any objections/input? i'm thinking of d
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 14:11:09 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > ok - now the ssl stuff for ecore_con is done - i finished up the
> > ecore_x_image api that was incomplete and did some more cleaning and
> > bugfixing - i think
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> ok - now the ssl stuff for ecore_con is done - i finished up the ecore_x_image
> api that was incomplete and did some more cleaning and bugfixing - i think
> we're ready for 1.0 beta for efl. any objections/input? i'm thinking of doin
ok - now the ssl stuff for ecore_con is done - i finished up the ecore_x_image
api that was incomplete and did some more cleaning and bugfixing - i think
we're ready for 1.0 beta for efl. any objections/input? i'm thinking of doing
it tomorrow (so within about 24hrs from now).
--
- Co
29 matches
Mail list logo
