[E-devel] Efl tree - detection of Eina_Unicode's size is broken

2012-12-19 Thread Tom Hacohen
Hey Vincent, http://build.enlightenment.fr/builders/full-linux/builds/905/steps/compile%20efl/logs/stdio Look at the detection of Eina_Unicode's size, it says it's 0. This should be fixed. It actually shouldn't be detected now that it's a single tree, but instead just use the value eina chooses

Re: [E-devel] Efl tree - detection of Eina_Unicode's size is broken

2012-12-19 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote: Hey Vincent, http://build.enlightenment.fr/builders/full-linux/builds/905/steps/compile%20efl/logs/stdio Look at the detection of Eina_Unicode's size, it says it's 0. This should be fixed. It actually shouldn't be detected

[E-devel] Efl tree - detection of fribidichar size is broken

2012-12-19 Thread Tom Hacohen
Hey Vincent, I fixed it (with an hack). For some reason EFL_OPTIONAL_DEPEND_PKG doesn't define FRIBIDI_CFLAGS as thus the next test fails (because it depends on that one). Please see commit 81385. Thanks, Tom. -- LogMeIn

Re: [E-devel] Efl tree - detection of fribidichar size is broken

2012-12-19 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote: Hey Vincent, I fixed it (with an hack). For some reason EFL_OPTIONAL_DEPEND_PKG doesn't define FRIBIDI_CFLAGS as thus the next test fails (because it depends on that one). Please see commit 81385. Hi Tom, this is my macro.

Re: [E-devel] Efl tree - detection of fribidichar size is broken

2012-12-19 Thread Tom Hacohen
Ok, so that explains why that specific detection, it depended on having FRIBIDI_CFLAGS. Thanks for your reply. Tom. On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote: Hey Vincent,

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-15 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 10/10/12 18:45, Lucas De Marchi wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-15 Thread Vincent Torri
there are some problems in the current efl/ tree on Windows. I have local changes so could it be possible that you don't commit anything until i finish that ? Btw, do we use only openssl and drop gnutls ? Vincent --

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-15 Thread Cedric BAIL
Cedric Bail On Oct 15, 2012 8:34 PM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote: there are some problems in the current efl/ tree on Windows. I have local changes so could it be possible that you don't commit anything until i finish that ? Btw, do we use only openssl and drop gnutls ? No,

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-15 Thread Vincent Torri
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Cedric BAIL moa.blueb...@gmail.com wrote: Cedric Bail On Oct 15, 2012 8:34 PM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote: there are some problems in the current efl/ tree on Windows. I have local changes so could it be possible that you don't commit anything

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-14 Thread Ralph Sennhauser
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:37:11 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: So again: Either force-disable/force-enable a feature or allow configure switches for it, automagic just causes more confusion and more work for packagers and users. more for packagers. less

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-14 Thread Ralph Sennhauser
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 11:40:36 +0200 Ralph Sennhauser gentoo.s...@bluewin.ch wrote: Automagic deps are harder to spot and need to be treated as hard dependencies in source based distros unless the packager patchs the build to add the missing configure option. Binary distros can indeed get away

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 11:40:36 +0200 Ralph Sennhauser gentoo.s...@bluewin.ch said: On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:37:11 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: So again: Either force-disable/force-enable a feature or allow configure switches for it, automagic just

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-12 Thread Thomas Sachau
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) schrieb: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:52:30 +0200 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org said: Tom Hacohen schrieb: On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 10:04, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 10/10/12 11:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-12 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:54:44 +0200 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org said: Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) schrieb: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:52:30 +0200 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org said: Tom Hacohen schrieb: On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 10:04, Tom

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-11 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:17:35 +0200 Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com said: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com said: Hello. On 10/10/12 08:12, Carsten Haitzler (The

[E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread The Rasterman
so everyone by now should know that we are merging all of core efl into a single efl tree. in the process simplifying options etc. please be aware that any changes you make to obj/eo, eina, eet or evil must also be done in the efl tree and we will soon enough decommission the old src trees (my

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
ecore-con can drop the flag for enable/disable c-ares support; this should ONLY be enabled on windows, and it can be detected as such at configure time. I'd like to say the same about ipv6 support across the board, but people will likely throw tantrums On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Carsten

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: so everyone by now should know that we are merging all of core efl into a single efl tree. in the process simplifying options etc. please be aware that any changes you make to obj/eo, eina, eet or evil must also be

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 10/10/12 08:12, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: what i want is for everyone please to test the efl tree and look at configure options and find things to clean up/remove/whatever. i already think we need to remove much more. Magic checks, debug and log level left out here

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 10/10/12 10:37, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Magic checks, debug and log level left out here as they seem to be handled by profiles. Should valgrind support also be handled with this? I guess. Unit tests, coverage and benchmark will be enabled for all libs at once I suppose. Unit tests and

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread David Seikel
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote: Image loaders are way more complicated sadly as we drag in dependencies here. I would vote for making jpeg, png, gif, bmp, eet on by default. For the others we might need to see what libs distros ship in a

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Christopher Michael
On 10/10/12 09:46, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 10/10/12 10:37, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Magic checks, debug and log level left out here as they seem to be handled by profiles. Should valgrind support also be handled with this? I guess. Unit tests, coverage and benchmark will be enabled for all libs

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 10/10/12 11:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote: Image loaders are way more complicated sadly as we drag in dependencies here. I would vote for making jpeg, png, gif, bmp,

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 10/10/12 09:56, Christopher Michael wrote: On 10/10/12 09:46, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 10/10/12 10:37, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Image loaders are way more complicated sadly as we drag in dependencies here. I would vote for making jpeg, png, gif, bmp, eet on by default. Bmp ? Who uses

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 10/10/12 11:07, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Are these things actually released and in the distros by now? Harfbuzz: probably soon (already?). Fribidi: it's there in debian stable, I think. :) Agreed (wrt the ignoring). Some people have no need for it as they do not utilize multiple languages,

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Christopher Michael
On 10/10/12 10:07, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 09:56, Christopher Michael wrote: On 10/10/12 09:46, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 10/10/12 10:37, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Image loaders are way more complicated sadly as we drag in dependencies here. I would vote for making jpeg, png, gif,

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 10:04, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 10/10/12 11:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote: Image loaders are way more

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread David Seikel
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:00:54 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote: Image loaders are way more complicated sadly as we drag in dependencies here. I

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread David Seikel
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:15:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote: On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 10:04, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 10/10/12 11:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
I prefer my stripes to be red, white, and blue, thank you very much On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:27 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:15:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote: On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 10/10/12 11:27, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:15:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote: On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 10:04, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 10/10/12 11:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 10/10/12 10:17, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:00:54 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote: On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote: But I disagree here. Autodetection is even

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread David Seikel
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:33:30 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 10:17, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:00:54 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote: On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 10/10/12 10:27, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:15:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote: I think the ideas is to remove useless options, not useful. :) I'm not really against it, I'm fine with automagically detecting stuff if packagers don't find this

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 10/10/12 10:40, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:33:30 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote: On 10/10/12 10:17, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:00:54 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote: On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote: On

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread David Seikel
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:42:21 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 10:27, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:15:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote: I think the ideas is to remove useless options, not useful. :) I'm not really

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:33:30AM +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 10:17, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:00:54 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote: On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 10/10/12 12:30, Martin Jansa wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:33:30AM +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 10:17, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:00:54 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote: On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com javascript:; wrote: Image loaders are way more complicated sadly as we drag in dependencies here. I would vote for making jpeg, png, gif, bmp, eet on by default.

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 10/10/12 10:37, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Magic checks, debug and log level left out here as they seem to be handled by profiles. Should valgrind support also be handled with this? I guess. Unit tests, coverage and benchmark will be

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com said: Hello. On 10/10/12 08:12, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: what i want is for everyone please to test the efl tree and look at configure options and find things to clean up/remove/whatever. i already

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com said: Hello. On 10/10/12 08:12, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: what i want is for everyone please to test the efl tree and look

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:15:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi javascript:; said: On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 10/10/12 10:37, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Magic checks, debug and log

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote: On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:15:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi javascript:; said: On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Tom Hacohen

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote: On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:15:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote: On Wednesday, October 10, 2012,

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Gustavo

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread Thomas Sachau
Tom Hacohen schrieb: On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 10:04, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 10/10/12 11:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote: Image loaders

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:39:34 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi said: On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:15:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi javascript:; said: On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Tom

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:52:30 +0200 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org said: Tom Hacohen schrieb: On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 10:04, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 10/10/12 11:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 10