On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:55:57 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:04:52 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
> >
> >> my git master/HEAD build, it is giving me an error about this being
> >> NULL with the
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:04:52 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>
> said:
>
>> my git master/HEAD build, it is giving me an error about this being
>> NULL with the old-fashioned ecore magic checks.
>>
>> this happened while running ELM_ENGINE
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:04:52 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> my git master/HEAD build, it is giving me an error about this being
> NULL with the old-fashioned ecore magic checks.
>
> this happened while running ELM_ENGINE=fb.
weird. i don't see it:
10:35PM ~ > export ELM_ENGINE=fb
10:35P
my git master/HEAD build, it is giving me an error about this being
NULL with the old-fashioned ecore magic checks.
this happened while running ELM_ENGINE=fb.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 01:34:34 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>
> said:
>
>> Hi
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 01:34:34 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> Hi all,
>
> In elm_win.c (git head) we get an ecore magic fail due calling
> ecore_evas_{show,hide)(sd->pointer.ee), which is always NULL as this
> is never set.
>
> what is this supposed to be? Should this pointer be deleted an
Hi all,
In elm_win.c (git head) we get an ecore magic fail due calling
ecore_evas_{show,hide)(sd->pointer.ee), which is always NULL as this
is never set.
what is this supposed to be? Should this pointer be deleted and also
associated calls? should we check for these pointers being !NULL?
--
Gus
On 08/01/13 10:30, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 10:21:01 + Christopher Michael
>
> said:
>
>> On 08/01/13 10:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:43:31 + Michael Blumenkrantz
>>> said:
>>>
yes, I'm aware that it's not
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 10:21:01 + Christopher Michael
said:
> On 08/01/13 10:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:43:31 + Michael Blumenkrantz
> > said:
> >
> >> yes, I'm aware that it's not min size, though elm does not provide any
> >> method for directly
On 08/01/13 10:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:43:31 + Michael Blumenkrantz
> said:
>
>> yes, I'm aware that it's not min size, though elm does not provide any
>> method for directly setting those either.
>
> min size is set as an implicit bi-product of the
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:43:31 + Michael Blumenkrantz
said:
> yes, I'm aware that it's not min size, though elm does not provide any
> method for directly setting those either.
min size is set as an implicit bi-product of the widgets packed into the window
as resize objects and their min/max si
yes, I'm aware that it's not min size, though elm does not provide any
method for directly setting those either.
reading through 1.7 branch, however, I see nothing that's applying the base
size or any other ICCCM hints that you're allowed to set. if it's in trunk,
great.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:50:14 + Michael Blumenkrantz
said:
> it seems that any elm_win functions which set icccm window hints, such as
> elm_win_size_base_set(), do nothing, and never have. I'm assuming this is
> not intentional?
umm no - this works... because ummm terminology uses it.. and it
it seems that any elm_win functions which set icccm window hints, such as
elm_win_size_base_set(), do nothing, and never have. I'm assuming this is
not intentional?
--
Master SQL Server Development, Administration, T-SQL, S
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:28:13 -0400 Christopher Michael
said:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:53:05 -0400 Christopher Michael
> > said:
> >
> >> Just wondering if there are plans to make an elm_win_centered_set ? Or
> >> if this is even desired...isn't rocke
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:53:05 -0400 Christopher Michael
>
> said:
>
>> Just wondering if there are plans to make an elm_win_centered_set ? Or
>> if this is even desired...isn't rocket science, but seems odd that
>> something so obvious is missing from E
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:53:05 -0400 Christopher Michael
said:
> Just wondering if there are plans to make an elm_win_centered_set ? Or
> if this is even desired...isn't rocket science, but seems odd that
> something so obvious is missing from Elementary which makes me think
> that there is/was
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Christopher
> Michael wrote:
>> Just wondering if there are plans to make an elm_win_centered_set ? Or
>> if this is even desired...isn't rocket science, but seems odd that
>> something so obvious is missing from Elementary which m
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Christopher
Michael wrote:
> Just wondering if there are plans to make an elm_win_centered_set ? Or
> if this is even desired...isn't rocket science, but seems odd that
> something so obvious is missing from Elementary which makes me think
> that there is/was a rea
Just wondering if there are plans to make an elm_win_centered_set ? Or
if this is even desired...isn't rocket science, but seems odd that
something so obvious is missing from Elementary which makes me think
that there is/was a reason...
Thoughts ?
dh
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
