On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:35 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:26:47 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:31 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:26:47 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:31 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:57:04 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> >
> >
> >
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:31 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:57:04 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>
> > Guys, I did a quick test with emotion_test (c version) and it's
> > leaking... I'm running home, but t
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:57:04 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Guys, I did a quick test with emotion_test (c version) and it's
> leaking... I'm running home, but the relevant part is:
>
> ==19235== LEAK SUMMARY:
> ==19235==definitely lost: 112 bytes in 6 blocks.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
enlightenment-devel m
Guys, I did a quick test with emotion_test (c version) and it's
leaking... I'm running home, but the relevant part is:
==19235== LEAK SUMMARY:
==19235==definitely lost: 112 bytes in 6 blocks.
==19235==indirectly lost: 240 bytes in 20 blocks.
==19235== possibly lost: 37,053 bytes in 90
If you search for python suppressions for valgrind, you should find
some that will help make the log shorter and hopefully more useful to
us.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Joost Albers
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Joost Albers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Followed your advice but it does not make a whole of sence to me. Attached
> is the debug log
Hi Joost,
The log is cut :-( gzip it and send in private to me so I can host
it somewhere so others can see...
Most (all?)
Running valgrind against it may point out where the leak is occurring,
but it will also require some suppressions as it thinks Python leaks
at times when it manages it's memory allocations.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:04 AM, Joost Albers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Emotion/xine is leaking memory for me.
>
> I am using python-emotion Gustav Barbieri helped out and concluded that
> it has nothing to do with the python bindings.
>
> evas_object_delete() is being called, but even with t
Emotion/xine is leaking memory for me.
I am using python-emotion Gustav Barbieri helped out and concluded that
it has nothing to do with the python bindings.
evas_object_delete() is being called, but even with that memory is not
being freed.
I am using the latest nightly builds of e17 libs and
11 matches
Mail list logo
