On 04/21/2014 12:02 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:44:39 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> said:
>
>> so... i have... had... a brainfart
>>
>> wouldn't it be good to add supported callbacks into the .eo files? why?
>> 1. documentation can easily list ca
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:02:57 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:44:39 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> said:
>
> > so... i have... had... a brainfart
> >
> > wouldn't it be good to add supported callbacks into the .eo files?
> > why? 1. documentation
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:44:39 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
said:
> so... i have... had... a brainfart
>
> wouldn't it be good to add supported callbacks into the .eo files? why?
> 1. documentation can easily list callbacks supported from the .eo file
> 2. ide's etc. can properly tab-com
so... i have... had... a brainfart
wouldn't it be good to add supported callbacks into the .eo files? why?
1. documentation can easily list callbacks supported from the .eo file
2. ide's etc. can properly tab-complete on supported callbacks only
3. could have a linter that you run over your code t
