On 10/05/16 16:33, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 May 2016 12:36:51 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>> 3. put a partname string just about everywhere into any api that may deal
>> with
>> part names (can be optional in bindings
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2016 12:36:51 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> 3. put a partname string just about everywhere into any api that may deal with
> part names (can be optional in bindings - maybe add static inlines without
> part
> param so passing N
On 10/05/16 12:38, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> Thanks for clearing things up.
>
> On 10 May 2016 at 20:18, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
>>
>> On 10/05/16 11:52, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
>>> Hey Tom,
>>>
>>> On 10 May 2016 at 19:06, Tom Hacohen wrote:
I already described a better scheme in the ema
Thanks for clearing things up.
On 10 May 2016 at 20:18, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
> On 10/05/16 11:52, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> > Hey Tom,
> >
> > On 10 May 2016 at 19:06, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >> I already described a better scheme in the email I referred to
> >> previously. It solves all teh pr
On 10/05/16 11:52, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> Hey Tom,
>
> On 10 May 2016 at 19:06, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> I already described a better scheme in the email I referred to
>> previously. It solves all teh problems for both proxy and normal objects
>> and both use cases, single and multi. All of th
Hey Tom,
On 10 May 2016 at 19:06, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 09/05/16 07:34, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> > On 6 May 2016 at 21:09, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >
> >> On 29/04/16 05:36, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> >>> Hi Tom,
> >>>
> >>> On 29 April 2016 at 11:32, Jean-Philippe André
> >> wrote:
> >>>
On 09/05/16 07:34, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 21:09, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
>> On 29/04/16 05:36, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> On 29 April 2016 at 11:32, Jean-Philippe André
>> wrote:
>>>
On 29 April 2016 at 00:51, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> O
On 07/05/16 03:11, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2016 12:36:51 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> On 01/05/16 02:09, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:05:33 +0900 Jean-Philippe André
>>> said:
>>>
On 30 April 2016 at 02:31, Davide Andreoli wrote:
> 2016-04-28 1
On 6 May 2016 at 21:09, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 29/04/16 05:36, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On 29 April 2016 at 11:32, Jean-Philippe André
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 29 April 2016 at 00:51, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 28/04/16 06:25, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
>
On Fri, 6 May 2016 12:35:04 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 30/04/16 02:51, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:32:39 +0900 Jean-Philippe André
> > said:
> >
> >> On 29 April 2016 at 00:51, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 28/04/16 06:25, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> On 27 Apri
On Fri, 6 May 2016 12:36:51 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 01/05/16 02:09, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:05:33 +0900 Jean-Philippe André
> > said:
> >
> >> On 30 April 2016 at 02:31, Davide Andreoli wrote:
> >>
> >>> 2016-04-28 17:51 GMT+02:00 Tom Hacohen :
> >>>
> On 28
On 29/04/16 05:36, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 29 April 2016 at 11:32, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 29 April 2016 at 00:51, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>
>>> On 28/04/16 06:25, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
On 27 April 2016 at 23:44, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 26/04/1
On 29/04/16 03:32, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> On 29 April 2016 at 00:51, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
>> On 28/04/16 06:25, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
>>> On 27 April 2016 at 23:44, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>>
On 26/04/16 06:28, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I've just merged
On 01/05/16 02:09, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:05:33 +0900 Jean-Philippe André
> said:
>
>> On 30 April 2016 at 02:31, Davide Andreoli wrote:
>>
>>> 2016-04-28 17:51 GMT+02:00 Tom Hacohen :
>>>
On 28/04/16 06:25, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> On 27 April 2016 at 23:4
On 30/04/16 02:51, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:32:39 +0900 Jean-Philippe André
> said:
>
>> On 29 April 2016 at 00:51, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>
>>> On 28/04/16 06:25, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
On 27 April 2016 at 23:44, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 26/04/16 06:28, Je
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:05:33 +0900 Jean-Philippe André said:
> On 30 April 2016 at 02:31, Davide Andreoli wrote:
>
> > 2016-04-28 17:51 GMT+02:00 Tom Hacohen :
> >
> > > On 28/04/16 06:25, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> > > > On 27 April 2016 at 23:44, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On 26/0
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:32:39 +0900 Jean-Philippe André said:
> On 29 April 2016 at 00:51, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
> > On 28/04/16 06:25, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> > > On 27 April 2016 at 23:44, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 26/04/16 06:28, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>>
2016-04-30 4:05 GMT+02:00 Jean-Philippe André :
> On 30 April 2016 at 02:31, Davide Andreoli wrote:
>
> > 2016-04-28 17:51 GMT+02:00 Tom Hacohen :
> >
> > > On 28/04/16 06:25, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> > > > On 27 April 2016 at 23:44, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On 26/04/16 06:28, Jea
On 30 April 2016 at 02:31, Davide Andreoli wrote:
> 2016-04-28 17:51 GMT+02:00 Tom Hacohen :
>
> > On 28/04/16 06:25, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> > > On 27 April 2016 at 23:44, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 26/04/16 06:28, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> I
2016-04-28 17:51 GMT+02:00 Tom Hacohen :
> On 28/04/16 06:25, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> > On 27 April 2016 at 23:44, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >
> >> On 26/04/16 06:28, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I've just merged a series of commits dealing with the box & table APIs
>
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:22:09 +0900 Jean-Philippe André
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29 April 2016 at 12:19, David Seikel wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:32:39 +0900 Jean-Philippe André
> > wrote:
> >
> > > As for bindings, they need to be able to dynamically know which
> > > functions an object su
Hi Tom,
On 29 April 2016 at 11:32, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
>
>
> On 29 April 2016 at 00:51, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
>> On 28/04/16 06:25, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
>> > On 27 April 2016 at 23:44, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 26/04/16 06:28, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>>
Hi,
On 29 April 2016 at 12:19, David Seikel wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:32:39 +0900 Jean-Philippe André
> wrote:
>
> > As for bindings, they need to be able to dynamically know which
> > functions an object support based on its class (here the object is an
> > instance of a class implementi
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:32:39 +0900 Jean-Philippe André
wrote:
> As for bindings, they need to be able to dynamically know which
> functions an object support based on its class (here the object is an
> instance of a class implementing Efl.Pack). Otherwise I don't see how
> any binding would work
On 29 April 2016 at 00:51, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 28/04/16 06:25, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> > On 27 April 2016 at 23:44, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >
> >> On 26/04/16 06:28, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I've just merged a series of commits dealing with the box & table
On 28/04/16 06:25, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> On 27 April 2016 at 23:44, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
>> On 26/04/16 06:28, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> I've just merged a series of commits dealing with the box & table APIs
>> for
>>> Edje.Object and Elm.Layout. Since we decided not
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:25:38 +0900 Jean-Philippe André
wrote:
> On 27 April 2016 at 23:44, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
> > On 26/04/16 06:28, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > >
> > > I've just merged a series of commits dealing with the box & table
> > > APIs
> > for
> > > Edje.Object
On 27 April 2016 at 23:44, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 26/04/16 06:28, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > I've just merged a series of commits dealing with the box & table APIs
> for
> > Edje.Object and Elm.Layout. Since we decided not to implement anything
> like
> > eo_part at the co
On 26/04/16 06:28, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I've just merged a series of commits dealing with the box & table APIs for
> Edje.Object and Elm.Layout. Since we decided not to implement anything like
> eo_part at the core eo level, I've implemented part_box and part_table
> support us
On 26 April 2016 at 14:28, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> I've just merged a series of commits dealing with the box & table APIs for
> Edje.Object and Elm.Layout. Since we decided not to implement anything like
> eo_part at the core eo level, I've implemented part_box and part_table
> support using
Hello,
I've just merged a series of commits dealing with the box & table APIs for
Edje.Object and Elm.Layout. Since we decided not to implement anything like
eo_part at the core eo level, I've implemented part_box and part_table
support using fake objects.
This code:
> elm_layout_table_blah(ly,
31 matches
Mail list logo