On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:41:21 + Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote:
Sorry for the delay. I checked, and it works. Though I did figure out
what you probably did wrong. The deal is, we don't have an edje font
loader per se, but only an eet loader. This means that you should the
full EET section
I'm glad!
On 5 Jan 2013 09:47, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:41:21 + Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote:
Sorry for the delay. I checked, and it works. Though I did figure out
what you probably did wrong. The deal is, we don't have an edje font
loader per
Sorry for the delay. I checked, and it works. Though I did figure out what
you probably did wrong. The deal is, we don't have an edje font loader per
se, but only an eet loader. This means that you should the full EET section
name. Fit example, with an edje don't named TOM you'd have to use the
Yeah, hm.. I'll try to get something as soon as I can.
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:25 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:59:15 + Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote:
Again, could you please show me the exact style you have used? I'm
coming to believe you may
That's odd. What style did you use with the evas made textblock?
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:54 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 11:12:26 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:54:10 + Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote:
Ok,
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:01:41 + Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote:
That's odd. What style did you use with the evas made textblock?
I tried many variations, referring to the font by name, the alias
for the font in the edje file, the text style name as listed in the
edje file, a copy of that
Again, could you please show me the exact style you have used? I'm coming
to believe you may have not set the source of the font in the style and
possibly didn't load it correctly.
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:20 PM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:01:41 + Tom
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:59:15 + Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote:
Again, could you please show me the exact style you have used? I'm
coming to believe you may have not set the source of the font in the
style and possibly didn't load it correctly.
Like I said, I tried many variations, but I
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 11:12:26 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:54:10 + Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote:
Ok, cool I have no idea what went there. I'm just haply it's fixed
now. :)
Not actually fixed fully. I consider putting fontconfig back again a
Ok, cool I have no idea what went there. I'm just haply it's fixed now. :)
On 14 Dec 2012 02:25, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:49:51 + Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote:
Did you only update the EFL or other things as well?
The update to EFL 1.7 required
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:54:10 + Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote:
Ok, cool I have no idea what went there. I'm just haply it's fixed
now. :)
Not actually fixed fully. I consider putting fontconfig back again a
work around. I don't have time to investigate more now, so I'll live
with that
Did you only update the EFL or other things as well?
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:09 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me, or does evas_text_block not work under Linux fb in the
1.7.3 release? I'm not seeing the text, with or without fontconfig.
The same code works fine
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:49:51 + Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote:
Did you only update the EFL or other things as well?
The update to EFL 1.7 required pthreads. The C library I was using
before had lousy threading support, which was fine before, I was
disabling it anyway. With pthreads
13 matches
Mail list logo
