On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 18:21:44 +0100 "Kim Woelders" said:
well that was kind of my point :) it's broken currently in 1 situation (file
modified within the same second). checking for size and inode number MAY also
help as writing a new file may use a new inode and be of different size, so
it's "less
Umm... my suggestion doesn't break anything... but it doesn't fix the
issue at hand :)
I have committed the obvious correction (test time stamp equality, not
greater than).
I think the only way to make further improvements is to use sub-second
time info when available, as raster suggests.
I
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:51:33 +0100 "Jesper Saxtorph"
said:
the problem is - you are BOTH right and BOTH things break something.
suggestion. use things OTHEr than modified timestamp for comparisons. ie
timestamp must EXACTLY match for caching (== not >=), ANd size, and mode, and
uid and gid, inode
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Woelders [mailto:k...@woelders.dk]
> Sent: 17. marts 2011 00:40
> To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Jesper Saxtorph
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] imlib2 caching can fail
>
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:36:07 +0100, Jesper Saxtorp
n Haitzler
>> > Cc: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Jesper Saxtorph
>> > Subject: Re: [E-devel] imlib2 caching can fail
>> >
>> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:31:32 +0100, Carsten Haitzler
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 0
On Friday 11 March 2011, 18:13:20, Jesper Saxtorph wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kim Woelders [mailto:k...@woelders.dk]
> > Sent: 10. marts 2011 20:52
> > To: Carsten Haitzler
> > Cc: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Jesper Saxtorph
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Woelders [mailto:k...@woelders.dk]
> Sent: 10. marts 2011 20:52
> To: Carsten Haitzler
> Cc: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Jesper Saxtorph
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] imlib2 caching can fail
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:31:32 +0100, Carsten Haitzler
wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 07:49:59 +0100 "Kim Woelders" said:
>
>> On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 15:46:15 +0100, Jesper Saxtorph
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I have just submitted a bugraport + a patch on trac (bug #716).
>> >
>> > I just wanted to notifify
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 07:49:59 +0100 "Kim Woelders" said:
> On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 15:46:15 +0100, Jesper Saxtorph
> wrote:
>
> > I have just submitted a bugraport + a patch on trac (bug #716).
> >
> > I just wanted to notifify it here also as I do not know the
> > enlightenment community and how
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Woelders [mailto:k...@woelders.dk]
> Sent: 6. marts 2011 07:50
> To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Jesper Saxtorph
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] imlib2 caching can fail
>
> On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 15:46:15 +0100, Jesper Saxtorph
&g
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 15:46:15 +0100, Jesper Saxtorph
wrote:
> I have just submitted a bugraport + a patch on trac (bug #716).
>
> I just wanted to notifify it here also as I do not know the
> enlightenment community and how it works.
>
Either is fine.
> To repeat my bug report:
> "I use imlib2
I have just submitted a bugraport + a patch on trac (bug #716).
I just wanted to notifify it here also as I do not know the
enlightenment community and how it works.
To repeat my bug report:
"I use imlib2 as a image library in a project. However the use we have
sometimes tricker a situation where
12 matches
Mail list logo
