Hi,
On 17 August 2016 at 04:55, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > No, that is a no go, because you don't always want to methods as EAPI
> > (think internal classes).
>
All eo symbols are currently marked as EOAPI which means EAPI EAPI_WEA
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> No, that is a no go, because you don't always want to methods as EAPI
> (think internal classes).
>
> The correct thing would be to add the warning/error.
what are you talking about? It's the same that .eo.h does if you
properly #define ..._PR
No, that is a no go, because you don't always want to methods as EAPI
(think internal classes).
The correct thing would be to add the warning/error.
--
Tom.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <
barbi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Felipe Magno de
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Felipe Magno de Almeida
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 16/08/16 15:38, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>> According to Daniel there are no ifdefs in the .eo.c... So I don't
>>> understand the problem...
>>
>> Actually, I can
On 16/08/16 15:38, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 16/08/16 15:27, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 16/08/16 15:19, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Tom Hacohen
>>> wrote:
On 16/08/16 14:48, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Tom Hacohe
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 16/08/16 15:38, Tom Hacohen wrote:
[snip]
>> According to Daniel there are no ifdefs in the .eo.c... So I don't
>> understand the problem...
>
> Actually, I can see why there would still be a problem because of the
> weak symbols thing.
>
On 16/08/16 15:27, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 16/08/16 15:19, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 16/08/16 14:48, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 16/08/16 04:38, Gustavo Sverz
On 16/08/16 15:19, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 16/08/16 14:48, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 16/08/16 04:38, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> it seems at the end
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 16/08/16 14:48, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 16/08/16 04:38, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
it seems at the end was a missing "#define ..._PROTECTED" in the .c
fil
On 16/08/16 14:48, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 16/08/16 04:38, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>> it seems at the end was a missing "#define ..._PROTECTED" in the .c
>>> file that includes the generated .eo.c.
>>>
>>> I wonder: shoul
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 16/08/16 04:38, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> it seems at the end was a missing "#define ..._PROTECTED" in the .c
>> file that includes the generated .eo.c.
>>
>> I wonder: shouldn't the generated .eo.c write:
>> #ifndef ..._PROTECTED
>
On 16/08/16 04:38, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> it seems at the end was a missing "#define ..._PROTECTED" in the .c
> file that includes the generated .eo.c.
>
> I wonder: shouldn't the generated .eo.c write:
> #ifndef ..._PROTECTED
> #define ..._PROTECTED
> #endif
>
No. The .eo.c should be i
it seems at the end was a missing "#define ..._PROTECTED" in the .c
file that includes the generated .eo.c.
I wonder: shouldn't the generated .eo.c write:
#ifndef ..._PROTECTED
#define ..._PROTECTED
#endif
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If you get
Hi all,
If you get my branch devs/barbieri/efl-io-interfaces [1] you can see
that the example efl_io_copier_example will fail to run with a strange
error as below.
The class hierarchy is:
- Efl.Io.Reader (interface), defines "can_read" property.
- Efl.Io.Reader.Fd (mixin on top of Efl.Io.Reade
14 matches
Mail list logo