On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 00:32:25 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> anyone have any qualms with me punting libungif support from imlib2 and just
> supporting giflib ? the entire point of libungif was to make a version of
> giflib that was free of the gay lzw patent, but now that the
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 12:49 am, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Wednesday, 07 September 2005, at 00:32:25 (-0400),
>
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > anyone have any qualms with me punting libungif support from imlib2
> > and just supporting giflib ? the entire point of libungif was to
> > make a
On Wednesday, 07 September 2005, at 00:32:25 (-0400),
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> anyone have any qualms with me punting libungif support from imlib2
> and just supporting giflib ? the entire point of libungif was to
> make a version of giflib that was free of the gay lzw patent, but
> now that the p
anyone have any qualms with me punting libungif support from imlib2 and just
supporting giflib ? the entire point of libungif was to make a version of
giflib that was free of the gay lzw patent, but now that the patent has
expired world wide, libungif is pointless and therefore supporting both
