Re: [E-devel] question about ecore_con

2011-04-04 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:58:52 +0200 Cedric BAIL said: >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Carsten Haitzler >> wrote: >> > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:05:39 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz >> > said: >> >> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 22:01:42 +0200 (CEST) >> >> V

Re: [E-devel] question about ecore_con

2011-04-04 Thread Tom Hacohen
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 14:24 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: > Now, think a bit : it's because of the Windows port that you have such > discussion :-D This just proves windows is the source of spam in my inbox :) -- Tom. --

Re: [E-devel] question about ecore_con

2011-04-04 Thread Vincent Torri
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:58:52 +0200 Cedric BAIL said: > >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Carsten Haitzler >> wrote: >>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:05:39 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz >>> said: On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 22:01:42 +0200 (CEST) >>

Re: [E-devel] question about ecore_con

2011-04-04 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:58:52 +0200 Cedric BAIL said: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:05:39 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz > > said: > >> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 22:01:42 +0200 (CEST) > >> Vincent Torri wrote: > >> > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz w

Re: [E-devel] question about ecore_con

2011-04-04 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:05:39 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz said: >> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 22:01:42 +0200 (CEST) >> Vincent Torri wrote: >> > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: >> > > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:40:53 +0200 (CEST) >> > > Vincent

Re: [E-devel] question about ecore_con

2011-04-04 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:05:39 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz said: > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 22:01:42 +0200 (CEST) > Vincent Torri wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:40:53 +0200 (CEST) > > > Vincent Torri wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> Hey, > > >

Re: [E-devel] question about ecore_con

2011-04-03 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 22:01:42 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:40:53 +0200 (CEST) > > Vincent Torri wrote: > > > >> > >> Hey, > >> > >> I'm currently porting ecore_con to Windows. The only problem (at least for > >>

Re: [E-devel] question about ecore_con

2011-04-03 Thread Vincent Torri
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:40:53 +0200 (CEST) > Vincent Torri wrote: > >> >> Hey, >> >> I'm currently porting ecore_con to Windows. The only problem (at least for >> compilation), is the AF_UNIX adress family for socket connection. If I'm >> not mistake

Re: [E-devel] question about ecore_con

2011-04-03 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:40:53 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri wrote: > > Hey, > > I'm currently porting ecore_con to Windows. The only problem (at least for > compilation), is the AF_UNIX adress family for socket connection. If I'm > not mistaken, it is mainly used for IPC. > > My question is about

[E-devel] question about ecore_con

2011-04-03 Thread Vincent Torri
Hey, I'm currently porting ecore_con to Windows. The only problem (at least for compilation), is the AF_UNIX adress family for socket connection. If I'm not mistaken, it is mainly used for IPC. My question is about how the unix part is working. Is it possible for the server to work async when