On Sun, 13 May 2012 18:27:05 + (UTC) Thomas Kueling
thomas.kuel...@gmail.com said:
Torri vincent.torri at gmail.com said:
actually forget lz4hc... lgpl3.
Well, apparently no longer :
LZ4 HC just went BSD.
http://code.google.com/p/lz4/
eet now supports both lz4 and lz4hc :)
] using LZ4 compression tool in eet ?
On Sun, 13 May 2012 18:27:05 + (UTC) Thomas Kueling
thomas.kuel...@gmail.com said:
Torri vincent.torri at gmail.com said:
actually forget lz4hc... lgpl3.
Well, apparently no longer :
LZ4 HC just went BSD.
http://code.google.com/p/lz4
Torri vincent.torri at gmail.com said:
actually forget lz4hc... lgpl3.
Well, apparently no longer :
LZ4 HC just went BSD.
http://code.google.com/p/lz4/
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event
Hi,
Someone from #tukaani on freenode has just made some benchmarks which
can be relevant here:
http://pokecraft.first-world.info/wiki/Quick_Benchmark:_Gzip_vs_Bzip2_vs_LZMA_vs_XZ_vs_LZ4_vs_LZO
Speed will probably be impacted quite a lot by the data but I expect
memory usage to not change.
On Sun, 13 May 2012 18:27:05 + (UTC) Thomas Kueling
thomas.kuel...@gmail.com said:
Torri vincent.torri at gmail.com said:
actually forget lz4hc... lgpl3.
Well, apparently no longer :
LZ4 HC just went BSD.
http://code.google.com/p/lz4/
ok... so now it's on the possible list.
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:30:02 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:10:46 +0200 thomasg tho...@gstaedtner.net
said:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 00:51, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
FSF may be good for their Four Freedoms, but they
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 00:51, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:42:22 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:05:09 +0200 thomasg tho...@gstaedtner.net
said:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 05:58, Carsten Haitzler
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:10:46 +0200 thomasg tho...@gstaedtner.net said:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 00:51, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:42:22 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:05:09 +0200 thomasg
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 05:58, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:08:18 +0200 Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com
said:
actually forget lz4hc... lgpl3.
hey
just found that while reading the gnutls ML :
http://code.google.com/p/lz4/
it seems that it
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:05 PM, thomasg tho...@gstaedtner.net wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 05:58, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:08:18 +0200 Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com
said:
actually forget lz4hc... lgpl3.
hey
just found that while
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 03:05:09PM +0200, thomasg wrote:
XZs liblzma is LGPLv2.1 though.
No, only the fallback support for limited platforms using gnulib is.
The rest is PD.
Joerg
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:42:22 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:05:09 +0200 thomasg tho...@gstaedtner.net
said:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 05:58, Carsten Haitzler
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:08:18 +0200 Vincent
hey
just found that while reading the gnutls ML :
http://code.google.com/p/lz4/
it seems that it allows the same ratio for compression than zlib but
seems to be by far faster than zlib
the memory consumption should be tested too.
What do you think ?
Vincent
13 matches
Mail list logo
