Re: [E-devel] valgrind regrets to report...

2006-01-11 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:53:23 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:11:50 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:36:02 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > babbled: > > > > > Since all, or most modu

Re: [E-devel] valgrind regrets to report...

2006-01-11 Thread David Seikel
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:11:50 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:36:02 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > babbled: > > > Since all, or most modules use the same source file name of > > e_mod_main.c, tracking down that last one took some

Re: [E-devel] valgrind regrets to report...

2006-01-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:36:02 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > As promised in a recent commit, I ran valgrind over things. After > fixing a few things in the emu module and running valgrind again, what > was left is in code I don't know anything about. > > The valgrind report is

[E-devel] valgrind regrets to report...

2006-01-10 Thread David Seikel
As promised in a recent commit, I ran valgrind over things. After fixing a few things in the emu module and running valgrind again, what was left is in code I don't know anything about. The valgrind report is attached. Since all, or most modules use the same source file name of e_mod_main.c, tra