On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> This is wrong, and as JP and Stefan said, breaks things. First of all,
> why add code to the non-debug variation? Also, if you're already adding
> to the non-debug variation, why not include it in the commit message?
>
This is wrong, and as JP and Stefan said, breaks things. First of all,
why add code to the non-debug variation? Also, if you're already adding
to the non-debug variation, why not include it in the commit message?
This is very misleading.
Anyhow, as the tests clearly show, efl_super() is also
Hello.
On 02/12/16 17:51, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> barbieri pushed a commit to branch master.
>
> http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=04450c4ee03fd20271ec4f911667acea10ba1375
>
> commit 04450c4ee03fd20271ec4f911667acea10ba1375
> Author: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
Hey Gustavo,
On 3 December 2016 at 01:51, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> barbieri pushed a commit to branch master.
>
> http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=
> 04450c4ee03fd20271ec4f911667acea10ba1375
>
> commit 04450c4ee03fd20271ec4f911667acea10ba1375
>
barbieri pushed a commit to branch master.
http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=04450c4ee03fd20271ec4f911667acea10ba1375
commit 04450c4ee03fd20271ec4f911667acea10ba1375
Author: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
Date: Fri Dec 2 14:49:06 2016 -0200
eo: if