On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:56:23 + Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Well, after further examination of the code engage now uses the e17
> theme if it is preset, otherwise falls back to the installed module
> theme.
>
> basically
>
> if (!e_theme_edje_object_set(obj, category, group
On Monday 19 December 2005 13:56, Andrew Williams wrote:
> Well, after further examination of the code engage now uses the e17
> theme if it is preset, otherwise falls back to the installed module
> theme.
>
> basically
>
> if (!e_theme_edje_object_set(obj, category, group)
> edje_object_file_set
Well, after further examination of the code engage now uses the e17
theme if it is preset, otherwise falls back to the installed module
theme.
basically
if (!e_theme_edje_object_set(obj, category, group)
edje_object_file_set(obj, file, group);
which works fine I think.
but is "theme/modules/en
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:24:43 + Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> 3rd party modules should really use this too - but it needs a fallback
> to the shipped theme. This way advanced e17 themes can specify theme
> parts for optional modules.
yeah. this is something that needs to be add
3rd party modules should really use this too - but it needs a fallback
to the shipped theme. This way advanced e17 themes can specify theme
parts for optional modules.
A
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 09:56:20PM +0900, David Stevenson wrote:
> 2005/12/1, Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I just
I would like to use it too, think it might help engage tidies (which are
vastly needed) but I need to play with the gadman attributes, so will
wait until that is fixed ;)
A
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0600, Brian Mattern wrote:
> On Thursday 01 December 2005 05:58, Essien Ita Essien wrote
On Thursday 01 December 2005 05:58, Essien Ita Essien wrote:
> I've looked at gadget_test/e_mod_main.c, and it looks good to me so far.
>
> I like how it really simplifies things. A real test IMOHO though, would be
> to use one of the existing simple modules (desktop name? or one simpler?),
> as th
2005/12/1, Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I just committed some code to simplify desktop module creation a little bit.Currently, every single module that draws to the desktop is pretty muchjust a copy/paste/edit of one of the original few modules.
I personally can vouch for that (^_^)
To avoi
I've looked at gadget_test/e_mod_main.c, and it looks good to me so far.
I like how it really simplifies things. A real test IMOHO though, would be
to use one of the existing simple modules (desktop name? or one simpler?),
as the real test bed. It will be a more compelling example, and
bugs/overs
