Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] adding check for elementary

2013-05-03 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 03/05/13 11:00, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> On 02/05/13 11:45, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Tom Hacohen >>> wrote: On 01/05/13 12:40, Cedric BAIL wrote: > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:48 PM

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] adding check for elementary

2013-05-03 Thread Daniel Juyung Seo
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 02/05/13 11:45, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Tom Hacohen >> wrote: >>> >>> On 01/05/13 12:40, Cedric BAIL wrote: On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:48 PM, ryuan Choi wrote: > > While digging some el

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] adding check for elementary

2013-05-03 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 02/05/13 11:45, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote: > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> On 01/05/13 12:40, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:48 PM, ryuan Choi wrote: While digging some elementary bug recently, I think that elementary needs unit testing framewor

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] adding check for elementary

2013-05-02 Thread Daniel Juyung Seo
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 01/05/13 12:40, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:48 PM, ryuan Choi wrote: >>> While digging some elementary bug recently, I think that elementary needs >>> unit testing framework like other EFL core modules in order to prevent

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] adding check for elementary

2013-05-01 Thread ryuan Choi
Can't we have both for elementary testing? I also wish to get exactness integrated well. It's really nice. But, I think that the focus of exactness and check are little bit different. In my understanding, exactness or something based on exactness can trace layouting issues. It's important and the

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] adding check for elementary

2013-05-01 Thread Gustavo Lima Chaves
* Tom Hacohen [2013-05-01 15:41:44 +0100]: > On 01/05/13 15:39, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > On 01/05/13 15:32, Gustavo Lima Chaves wrote: > >> * ryuan Choi [2013-05-01 19:48:43 +0900]: > >> > >> Is github login working fine? Borked for me :( Sorry for hijacking the > >> thread. > > > > If you are so

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] adding check for elementary

2013-05-01 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 01/05/13 15:39, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 01/05/13 15:32, Gustavo Lima Chaves wrote: >> * ryuan Choi [2013-05-01 19:48:43 +0900]: >> >> Is github login working fine? Borked for me :( Sorry for hijacking the >> thread. > > If you are sorry, why did you do it? :) > > Anyhow, I thought I've fixed i

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] adding check for elementary

2013-05-01 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 01/05/13 15:32, Gustavo Lima Chaves wrote: > * ryuan Choi [2013-05-01 19:48:43 +0900]: > > Is github login working fine? Borked for me :( Sorry for hijacking the thread. If you are sorry, why did you do it? :) Anyhow, I thought I've fixed it, let me check to see if there's anything else to b

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] adding check for elementary

2013-05-01 Thread Gustavo Lima Chaves
* ryuan Choi [2013-05-01 19:48:43 +0900]: Is github login working fine? Borked for me :( Sorry for hijacking the thread. > Hi, > > While digging some elementary bug recently, I think that elementary needs > unit testing framework like other EFL core modules in order to prevent > regressions or

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] adding check for elementary

2013-05-01 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 01/05/13 12:40, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:48 PM, ryuan Choi wrote: >> While digging some elementary bug recently, I think that elementary needs >> unit testing framework like other EFL core modules in order to prevent >> regressions or understand what commits fixed. >> >> Ca

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] adding check for elementary

2013-05-01 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:48 PM, ryuan Choi wrote: > While digging some elementary bug recently, I think that elementary needs > unit testing framework like other EFL core modules in order to prevent > regressions or understand what commits fixed. > > Can we have chance to introduce check for eleme