On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:44 AM, thomasg tho...@gstaedtner.net wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012, thomasg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
Hi Thomas,
The standard way is pretty fast and lean, but it is a SAX-like parser. That
mean you only get tokens, for the tags you need to call yet another
function to split the tag and arguments.
It is good enough to parse svg, as done by Esvg. Should be also enough to
parse config files and
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
Hi Thomas,
The standard way is pretty fast and lean, but it is a SAX-like parser. That
mean you only get tokens, for the tags you need to call yet another
function to split the tag and arguments.
It
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012, thomasg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi javascript:; wrote:
Hi Thomas,
The standard way is pretty fast and lean, but it is a SAX-like parser.
That
mean you only get tokens, for the tags you need
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012, thomasg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi javascript:; wrote:
Hi Thomas,
The standard way is pretty
