Nikolas Arend wrote:
>>> I just tried to apply this patch, but I'm getting a message "Only
>>> garbage was found in the patch input."
>>>
>>> Can you resend this as a diff for each file seperatly? Makes it much
>>> easier for me.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> dh
Committed to cvs, thanks :)
dh
---
Nikolas Arend wrote:
> So, uhm, does anybody have an opinion about it? Are there any problems
> with the patch, with applying it or code-wise? Some feedback would be
> appreciated. ;-)
I have your original emails saved in my Inbox. I have not had the time
to try and get them out of the email to
Nikolas Arend wrote:
> Nikolas Arend wrote:
>
>> Christopher Michael wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Sounds great :) Can you actually attach the patches tho? :) When I save
>>> attachments, all I get is the tomcat message :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I did attach them, even the first time. The
Nikolas Arend wrote:
> Christopher Michael wrote:
>
>> Sounds great :) Can you actually attach the patches tho? :) When I save
>> attachments, all I get is the tomcat message :)
>>
>>
>>
>
> I did attach them, even the first time. They didn't get through for some
> reason. But the patc
Christopher Michael wrote:
>
> Sounds great :) Can you actually attach the patches tho? :) When I save
> attachments, all I get is the tomcat message :)
>
>
I did attach them, even the first time. They didn't get through for some
reason. But the patches are included in the text of the email y
Nikolas Arend wrote:
> Hm, doesn't this list accept plain text attachments? I send them again,
> this time included in the message text. Let's see...
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> attached please find two patches for the mail module against current cvs.
> The patches are mutually exclusive. One (mail_small.
