On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:15:06 +0200 FORT Yannick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:16:33 +0200 FORT Yannick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > added :) the problem is the governor name is 1. not translatable, and 2. not
> > as descriptiv
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:42:59 -0600 Tres Melton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 12:16 +0200, FORT Yannick wrote:
> > While shifting from kernel 2.6.11 to 2.6.12, i notice that a new
> > governor for cpuscaling appears : conservative, that is less
> > configurable than "ondema
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:16:33 +0200 FORT Yannick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> added :) the problem is the governor name is 1. not translatable, and 2. not
> as
> descriptive as it could be in a gui - thus its detected and handled per
> governor. :)
>
Tha
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 12:16 +0200, FORT Yannick wrote:
> While shifting from kernel 2.6.11 to 2.6.12, i notice that a new
> governor for cpuscaling appears : conservative, that is less
> configurable than "ondemand" but totally optimized for laptops.
I apologize for commenting without knowing mu
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:16:33 +0200 FORT Yannick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> While shifting from kernel 2.6.11 to 2.6.12, i notice that a new
> governor for cpuscaling appears : conservative, that is less
> configurable than "ondemand" but totally optimized for laptops.
>
> The problem is the
