On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:49:22 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 06:56:39PM -0300, Jose Souza wrote:
> >> So its better move performance test to elm? Or remove performance test
> >> from build, and add a script t
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 06:56:39PM -0300, Jose Souza wrote:
>> So its better move performance test to elm? Or remove performance test
>> from build, and add a script to compile manually?
>
> Imho moving to elm should be enough, it could be dis
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 06:56:39PM -0300, Jose Souza wrote:
> So its better move performance test to elm? Or remove performance test
> from build, and add a script to compile manually?
Imho moving to elm should be enough, it could be disabled by default
there and if enabled it won't create circula
So its better move performance test to elm? Or remove performance test
from build, and add a script to compile manually?
I could make a patch to that.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Jose Souza
> wrote:
>> Why elm depends of e
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Jose Souza wrote:
> Why elm depends of edbus?
1 - it's a catch all, then it inits edbus... it does the same with
efreet (.desktop loader)
2 - it uses ethumb, ethumb uses edbus
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
Why elm depends of edbus?
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:30:41 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:42:17 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> > said:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:30:41 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:42:17 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
> >> wrote:
> >> > This bre
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:42:17 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
>> wrote:
>> > This breaks the build if you don't have elementary installed.
>> > Performance test requires
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:42:17 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
> wrote:
> > This breaks the build if you don't have elementary installed.
> > Performance test requires elementary (WTF!?!) which depends on e_dbus.
> > It should either
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
wrote:
> This breaks the build if you don't have elementary installed.
> Performance test requires elementary (WTF!?!) which depends on e_dbus.
> It should either not depend on elementary or be disabled by default.
>
similar to evas example
This breaks the build if you don't have elementary installed.
Performance test requires elementary (WTF!?!) which depends on e_dbus.
It should either not depend on elementary or be disabled by default.
Best regards, Etrunko
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> e_dbu
e_dbus build is still broken. Can you check this up?
performance.c:2:18: fatal error: Eina.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
CC e_dbus_connman0_7x_test_api-e_dbus_connman0_7x_test_api.o
make[3]: *** [e_dbus_performance-performance.o] Error 1
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On F
changelog, news.
removing an api is not quite nice
Vincent
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> e_dbus: Use idler instead of idler_enterer
>
> Instead of using an idle_enterer to process D-Bus messages, use andidler
> that does not requiring creating a dummy eve
13 matches
Mail list logo
