On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 14:01:21 +0500 Boldin Pavel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 02:04:33 +0500 Boldin Pavel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >babbled:
> >
> >
> >it's marked for me to read. i9 still don't like the "incompatible .edj"
> >thing
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 02:04:33 +0500 Boldin Pavel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>babbled:
>
>
>it's marked for me to read. i9 still don't like the "incompatible .edj" thing.
>i
>dont think this is something u neeed to break the format for. you DO know that
>the defa
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 02:04:33 +0500 Boldin Pavel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Hi, all!
>
> One question to Rasterman: you planing to include edje patch to cvs?
> Or it is again ugly and unusable?
it's marked for me to read. i9 still don't like the "incompatible .edj" thing. i
dont think this is
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
Boldin Pavel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-05 02:42]:
FAQ:
Q: Still I need to recompile all *.edj files?
A: Yes, you still need to do it. This is CVS and you should understand, that
backward compability is out of there.
Luckily, it's not you who will make that
Boldin Pavel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-05 02:42]:
> FAQ:
> Q: Still I need to recompile all *.edj files?
> A: Yes, you still need to do it. This is CVS and you should understand, that
> backward compability is out of there.
Luckily, it's not you who will make that decision.
Regards,
Tilman
-
