On 10/07/11 19:25, Vincent Torri wrote:
> i don't see how it can be possible to compile elm_map without any
> ecore_con checks in configure.ac. My commit was right and as I said, it
> was a first part of it.
>
As I said, I also think your commit was right, but it doesn't compile if
I don't reve
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Today I tried building elm on a machine that has ecore without ecore con. On
> that machine elm's build failed because of elm_map using ecore_con_url
> without ifdefs.
>
> Reverting vtorri's last commit fixed it
i don't see how it can be
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 15:15:57 +0300 Tom Hacohen
wrote:
> On 10/07/11 15:10, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:24:33 +0300 Tom Hacohen
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Today I tried building elm on a machine that has ecore without
> >> ecore con. On that machine elm's build failed because of elm_
On 10/07/11 15:10, David Seikel wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:24:33 +0300 Tom Hacohen
> wrote:
>
>> Today I tried building elm on a machine that has ecore without ecore
>> con. On that machine elm's build failed because of elm_map using
>> ecore_con_url without ifdefs.
>>
>> Reverting vtorri's
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:24:33 +0300 Tom Hacohen
wrote:
> Today I tried building elm on a machine that has ecore without ecore
> con. On that machine elm's build failed because of elm_map using
> ecore_con_url without ifdefs.
>
> Reverting vtorri's last commit fixed it, but I'm not sure if that'
