Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-09 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 10/10/12 03:30, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> On 09/10/12 14:01, ChunEon Park wrote: >>> When will u pick up eo from the PROTO? >> >> NEVER! It's already in trunk/efl, and that's the future (unlike HTML5). ;) > > To me, it seems to be the present.

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-09 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 09/10/12 23:47, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > classic. you can't take the address of a va_list, it will fail in very > different manners on different platforms/architectures. This means you > can't call va_arg() on different functions passing the arg around. > Unless you use some hacks. There's a ha

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-09 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 09/10/12 14:01, ChunEon Park wrote: >> When will u pick up eo from the PROTO? > > NEVER! It's already in trunk/efl, and that's the future (unlike HTML5). ;) To me, it seems to be the present. Maybe I am from the future ?! -- Cedric BAIL

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-09 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 09/10/12 14:01, ChunEon Park wrote: > When will u pick up eo from the PROTO? > NEVER! It's already in trunk/efl, and that's the future (unlike HTML5). ;) -- Tom. -- Don't let slow site performance ruin your business.

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-09 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 18:47:06 -0300 Lucas De Marchi said: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Christopher Michael > wrote: > > On 09/10/12 07:01, Tom Hacohen wrote: > >> On 09/10/12 07:55, David Seikel wrote: > >>> On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 06:46:43 +0100 michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: > >>> I'm go

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-09 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Christopher Michael wrote: > On 09/10/12 07:01, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> On 09/10/12 07:55, David Seikel wrote: >>> On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 06:46:43 +0100 michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: >>> I'm gonna assume this is part of that borking, at least until I get up >>> o

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-09 Thread Jérémy Zurcher
To fix directfb engine compilation. Jérémy diff --git a/evas/src/modules/engines/directfb/evas_engine.c b/evas/src/modules/engines/directfb/evas_engine.c index a6dce6a..ec4cc65 100644 --- a/evas/src/modules/engines/directfb/evas_engine.c +++ b/evas/src/modules/engines/directfb/evas_engine.c @@ -5

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-09 Thread ChunEon Park
When will u pick up eo from the PROTO? -Regards, Hermet- -Original Message- From: "David Seikel" To: ; Cc: Sent: 2012-10-09 (화) 18:38:32 Subject: Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:09:10 +0900 "daniel.za

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-09 Thread David Seikel
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:09:10 +0900 "daniel.za...@samsung.com" wrote: > On 10/09/2012 04:12 PM, David Seikel wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:58:01 +1000 David Seikel > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 08:49:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On 09/10/12 08:45, David Seikel wrote:

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-09 Thread daniel.za...@samsung.com
On 10/09/2012 04:12 PM, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:58:01 +1000 David Seikel > wrote: > >> On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 08:49:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen >> wrote: >> >>> On 09/10/12 08:45, David Seikel wrote: On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:37:13 +0900 "daniel.za...@samsung.com" wrote: >>

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-09 Thread David Seikel
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:58:01 +1000 David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 08:49:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen > wrote: > > > On 09/10/12 08:45, David Seikel wrote: > > > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:37:13 +0900 "daniel.za...@samsung.com" > > > wrote: > > > > > >> On 10/09/2012 03:31 PM, David Seikel wrote:

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-09 Thread Christopher Michael
On 09/10/12 07:58, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 08:49:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen > wrote: > >> On 09/10/12 08:45, David Seikel wrote: >>> On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:37:13 +0900 "daniel.za...@samsung.com" >>> wrote: >>> On 10/09/2012 03:31 PM, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-08 Thread David Seikel
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 08:49:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 09/10/12 08:45, David Seikel wrote: > > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:37:13 +0900 "daniel.za...@samsung.com" > > wrote: > > > >> On 10/09/2012 03:31 PM, David Seikel wrote: > >>> On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:26:10 +0100 Christopher Michael > >>> wro

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-08 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
unlikely. On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 09/10/12 08:45, David Seikel wrote: > > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:37:13 +0900 "daniel.za...@samsung.com" > > wrote: > > > >> On 10/09/2012 03:31 PM, David Seikel wrote: > >>> On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:26:10 +0100 Christopher Michael >

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-08 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 09/10/12 08:45, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:37:13 +0900 "daniel.za...@samsung.com" > wrote: > >> On 10/09/2012 03:31 PM, David Seikel wrote: >>> On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:26:10 +0100 Christopher Michael >>> wrote: >>> On 09/10/12 07:22, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 09 O

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-08 Thread David Seikel
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:37:13 +0900 "daniel.za...@samsung.com" wrote: > On 10/09/2012 03:31 PM, David Seikel wrote: > > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:26:10 +0100 Christopher Michael > > wrote: > > > >> On 09/10/12 07:22, David Seikel wrote: > >>> On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:11:51 +0100 Christopher Michael >

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-08 Thread daniel.za...@samsung.com
On 10/09/2012 03:31 PM, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:26:10 +0100 Christopher Michael > wrote: > >> On 09/10/12 07:22, David Seikel wrote: >>> On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:11:51 +0100 Christopher Michael >>> wrote: >>> On 09/10/12 07:01, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 09/10/12 07:55, D

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-08 Thread David Seikel
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:26:10 +0100 Christopher Michael wrote: > On 09/10/12 07:22, David Seikel wrote: > > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:11:51 +0100 Christopher Michael > > wrote: > > > >> On 09/10/12 07:01, Tom Hacohen wrote: > >>> On 09/10/12 07:55, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 06:4

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-08 Thread Christopher Michael
On 09/10/12 07:22, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:11:51 +0100 Christopher Michael > wrote: > >> On 09/10/12 07:01, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>> On 09/10/12 07:55, David Seikel wrote: On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 06:46:43 +0100 michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: I'm gonna assume this is

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-08 Thread David Seikel
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:11:51 +0100 Christopher Michael wrote: > On 09/10/12 07:01, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > On 09/10/12 07:55, David Seikel wrote: > >> On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 06:46:43 +0100 michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com > >> wrote: I'm gonna assume this is part of that borking, at least > >> until I

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-08 Thread David Seikel
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 08:01:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 09/10/12 07:55, David Seikel wrote: > > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 06:46:43 +0100 michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com > > wrote: I'm gonna assume this is part of that borking, at least > > until I get up off my fat arse to actually investigate - > >

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-08 Thread daniel.za...@samsung.com
On 10/09/2012 02:55 PM, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 06:46:43 +0100 michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: > >> "daniel.za...@samsung.com" wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Today, we committed the porting of Evas to Eo. >>> >>> In this new era, the Evas object inherits from Eo, and you don

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-08 Thread Christopher Michael
On 09/10/12 07:01, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 09/10/12 07:55, David Seikel wrote: >> On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 06:46:43 +0100 michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: >> I'm gonna assume this is part of that borking, at least until I get up >> off my fat arse to actually investigate - >> >> CC evas_obj

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-08 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 09/10/12 07:55, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 06:46:43 +0100 michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: > I'm gonna assume this is part of that borking, at least until I get up > off my fat arse to actually investigate - > >CC evas_object_image.lo > evas_object_image.c: In functio

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-08 Thread daniel.za...@samsung.com
On 10/09/2012 02:46 PM, michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: > "daniel.za...@samsung.com" wrote: > > Hi all, > > Today, we committed the porting of Evas to Eo. > > In this new era, the Evas object inherits from Eo, and you don't get > objects private data using "->" anymore, and m

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-08 Thread David Seikel
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 06:46:43 +0100 michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: > "daniel.za...@samsung.com" wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >Today, we committed the porting of Evas to Eo. > > > >In this new era, the Evas object inherits from Eo, and you don't get > >objects private data using "->" anymore,

Re: [E-devel] Eo-Evas commit completed

2012-10-08 Thread michael . blumenkrantz
"daniel.za...@samsung.com" wrote: >Hi all, > >Today, we committed the porting of Evas to Eo. > >In this new era, the Evas object inherits from Eo, and you don't get >objects private data using "->" anymore, and most of the adjustments >had >to do something with that. >You will see that some fun