Re: [E-devel] Etk - Authors' Explanation

2005-10-24 Thread Nathan Ingersoll
Simon,On 10/24/05, Simon TRENY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Your patch doesn't seem to fix anything here. Now, the situation is evenworst, I can't close anymore the menu by clicking anywhere on the parent window, I always have to click on a menu item. And keyboard navigationis more than just making a

RE: Re: [E-devel] Etk - Authors' Explanation

2005-10-24 Thread dan sinclair
> > 2- Themeing / Look and Feel: Ewl tends to re-use a lot of parts for > > several "similar" tasks but eventually ends up looking bad. For > > example, buttons are used for column headers for trees and for > > scrollbar drag buttons. Combining this with a lot of scaling and size > > calculation pr

RE: Re: [E-devel] Etk - Authors' Explanation

2005-10-24 Thread dan sinclair
> Disclaimer: I'm not familiar with EWL/Evas internals. > Can the items be made proxies for the real widgets, and just keep the > amount of items created for how many can be visible, and assign the > widgets to them as the widget scroll? If the item isnt visible, you > would free it or add it to a

Re: [E-devel] Etk - Authors' Explanation

2005-10-24 Thread Simon TRENY
That the only solution I see if you want to allow arbitrary widgets to be added to the tree efficiently. But all the widgets have then to have two methods, one to get the "state" of the widget, and another to restore it. And making those two methods for all the widgets is a lot of work and, for

Re: [E-devel] Etk - Authors' Explanation

2005-10-24 Thread Solerman Kaplon
Simon TRENY escreveu: [snip] > Here I fully disagree. I played a little bit with ewl_tree_test, and I > replaced the ROWS constant by 3000 (it was initially to 50) and I > removed the NEST modulo just to make sure all the rows will be directly > children of the tree itself (no collapsed rows). Res

Re: [E-devel] Etk - Authors' Explanation

2005-10-24 Thread Simon TRENY
Nathan Ingersoll a écrit : Hisham, I am only responding to your criticisms on EWL in this message, as I have already stated that I don't have a problem with people wanting to write their own toolkit. On 10/23/05, *Hisham Mardam Bey* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Hel

Re: [E-devel] Etk - Authors' Explanation

2005-10-23 Thread Nathan Ingersoll
Hisham, I am only responding to your criticisms on EWL in this message, as I have already stated that I don't have a problem with people wanting to write their own toolkit. On 10/23/05, Hisham Mardam Bey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello,We have noticed that Ewl lacked (at the time of creating Etk