On Fri 14 Feb 2003, Ben Martin wrote:
*snip*
> Maybe we can add a list of which projects should get the new love, so
> that folks dont start hacking on something like ebits1 etc? This way
> they know what is for hacking and that those projects need love no
> matter how many names are attached.
Gim
>> technically cvs does this for us :)
>
> Well, that was partially my point. But now that I think about it:
>
> - No, cvs only tracks who changes what. We need to encourage commit
> comments that say what the change does functionally.
> - I'd suggest not using the ChangeLog files on pre 1.0
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 06:37:12 EST, Kevin Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> - I'd suggest not using the ChangeLog files on pre 1.0 apps/libs and
> sticking to it. For packages that are stable, then a ChangeLog should
This implies that we force something to go to 1.0 when there's enough usage
"Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)" wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:19:26 -0500 Kevin Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > Ben Rockwood wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > (snip)
> > >been noted in the AUTHORS files of each project and the ChangeLog of
> >
> > Well, one of the points of doing ne
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:19:26 -0500 Kevin Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Ben Rockwood wrote:
> >
> >
> (snip)
> >been noted in the AUTHORS files of each project and the ChangeLog of
>
> Well, one of the points of doing new/early development in cvs is that
> you don't maintain a chang
On 14 Feb 2003 12:10:40 +1000 Ben Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 08:35, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> >
> > 1. collect all names from AUTHORS files. list all of them. (this will assume
> > the step of making sure they are up-to-date has been done) i REPEAT it is
> > th
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 08:35, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> 1. collect all names from AUTHORS files. list all of them. (this will assume the
> step of making sure they are up-to-date has been done) i REPEAT it is the
> responsibility of the contributors to make sure their patches include patches to
Agreed In which case you might wanna just put a reference to SF's CVS
Web, which can act as a ChangeLog. Since most projects aren't GPL I
don't think we're stuck with all the Changelog requirements.
benr.
> Ben Rockwood wrote:
>>
>>
> (snip)
>>been noted in the AUTHORS files of each pro
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:19:09 -0800 (PST) "Ben Rockwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
>
> Hello All.
>
> I'm planning a complete re-vamp of the team page soon to remove all the
> old non-active people from that page. The hope is to encourage new
> people to join the effort who may look at
Ben Rockwood wrote:
>
>
(snip)
>been noted in the AUTHORS files of each project and the ChangeLog of
Well, one of the points of doing new/early development in cvs is that
you don't maintain a changelog...
--
Kevin
---
This SF.NET email
10 matches
Mail list logo
