Re: [E-devel] Merging IPC REPLYs

2005-06-08 Thread Stafford Horne
Right, Fair enough, Its just a suggestion and I have no real preferance one way or the other. if it doesn't change that is fine with me. I just hope there isn't another huge IPC overhaul in the near future. Stafford On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 10:47 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2005

Re: [E-devel] Merging IPC REPLYs

2005-06-07 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:54:17 -0400 (EDT) dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > But what does this gain you? I'd say it makes confusing code even more > confusing. At least with separate blocks you know what is the REPLY and what > is going out. Get the E_LIB_IN stuff mixed in t

RE: [E-devel] Merging IPC REPLYs

2005-06-07 Thread dan sinclair
But what does this gain you? I'd say it makes confusing code even more confusing. At least with separate blocks you know what is the REPLY and what is going out. Get the E_LIB_IN stuff mixed in there and its gunna make some big chunks. Seems more readable to have separate ops handling the repl