On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:10 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 May 2008 03:58:14 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> As you can see from CVS log, I did some repacking of Evas_Object and
>> managed to save more
On Thu, 1 May 2008 03:58:14 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi guys,
>
> As you can see from CVS log, I did some repacking of Evas_Object and
> managed to save more than 80 bytes, almost 1/3 of it is gone.
>
> While some aggressive packing went in, like "layer" nu
Gustavo wrote:
>> It was more
>> about having all these things (including some older stuff) that
>> may or may not apply to this or that obj type, no way to know,
>> etc. Ideally a "pie in the sky" kind of thing would be an evas
>> based on an ecore_object 'object' system (with all the ecor
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Gustavo wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > As you can see from CVS log, I did some repacking of Evas_Object and
> > managed to save more than 80 bytes, almost 1/3 of it is gone.
> >
> > While some aggressive packing went
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 4:18 AM, Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As you can see from CVS log, I did some repacking of Evas_Object and
> > managed to save more than 80 bytes, almost 1/3 of it is gone.
> >
> > While some aggressive packing went in, like "layer" number being a
> > s
Gustavo wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> As you can see from CVS log, I did some repacking of Evas_Object and
> managed to save more than 80 bytes, almost 1/3 of it is gone.
>
> While some aggressive packing went in, like "layer" number being a
> short now, I'm a bit unsure if applying the attached patch
> As you can see from CVS log, I did some repacking of Evas_Object and
> managed to save more than 80 bytes, almost 1/3 of it is gone.
>
> While some aggressive packing went in, like "layer" number being a
> short now, I'm a bit unsure if applying the attached patch is a good
> thing. It will save
