On Thursday, 06 January 2005, at 14:44:10 (-0500),
Peter Hyman wrote:
> Precisely the point. Because no group is set, a default is assigned.
> That is wrong.
If you're root, yes. As a user, no. In any event, proper packaging
results in this not mattering one wit because the packaging
instructio
On Thursday, 06 January 2005, at 14:29:18 (-0500),
Peter Hyman wrote:
> On my system, Group becomes a 601 for some reason which in packaging
> is unacceptable. Either set the group too or omit this.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/cvs >> grep -ri group e16/e/themes/Makefile*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/cvs >>
'Nuf
On my system, Group becomes a 601 for some reason which in packaging is
unacceptable. Either set the group too or omit this.
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 14:22 -0500, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Thursday, 06 January 2005, at 12:11:42 (-0500),
> Peter Hyman wrote:
>
> > make install in e/themes is perha
On Thursday, 06 January 2005, at 12:11:42 (-0500),
Peter Hyman wrote:
> make install in e/themes is perhaps incorrect in that it tries and
> assign a group equal to the themes install directory.
Not on this planet, it doesn't. Where on earth did you come up with
that idea?
> install-data-local:
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 14:34 -0500, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Thursday, 06 January 2005, at 14:29:18 (-0500),
> Peter Hyman wrote:
>
> > On my system, Group becomes a 601 for some reason which in packaging
> > is unacceptable. Either set the group too or omit this.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/cvs >
See thread:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=6022045.
I have regularly considered expanding the *.etheme's into plain CVS
trees. That should bypass the problem entirely.
IMO, archiving the .etheme's as such goes against the whole purpose of
CVS anyway.
/Kim
Peter Hyman wrote:
m
