On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:55:25 +0100 Essien Ita Essien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:01:20 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> >
> >
> > i think that maybe we need several layers.
> >
> > 1. check pam
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:01:20 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
>
>
> i think that maybe we need several layers.
>
> 1. check pam as you suggested IF the halt/reboot/susbped/cpufreq pam profile
> is
> there - if not go to second
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 06:55:16 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:51:19 +0100 Essien Ita Essien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> > Eugen Minciu wrote:
> > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:08:52 +
> > > Hannes Janetzek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> i agree - it's useful in all places. in reality - most suspend systems
> use a
> script or command to initiate the suspend. the ONLY thing we need to do, is
> execute this script/command as root. i don't think we need an api - but what
> we
> DO need is to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:36:52 +0900
schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:01:20 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> > On 8/24/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:01:20 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On 8/24/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > simply parse that 1 liner - look for the (...something...) and if that
> > starts with localhost, :, 127.0.0.1, then we know the user i
On 8/24/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> simply parse that 1 liner - look for the (...something...) and if that starts
> with localhost, :, 127.0.0.1, then we know the user is logged in locally or
> from locally and we can approve the action.
>
> now - back to if it
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:51:19 +0100 Essien Ita Essien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Eugen Minciu wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:08:52 +
> > Hannes Janetzek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This sounds good too. It would be even better as a module, I think. I'm
> > waiting for some other o
Eugen Minciu wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:08:52 +
> Hannes Janetzek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This sounds good too. It would be even better as a module, I think. I'm
> waiting for some other opinions on this subject and if other people agree,
> I'll try to start writing it in a few da
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:08:52 +
Hannes Janetzek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This sounds good too. It would be even better as a module, I think. I'm waiting
for some other opinions on this subject and if other people agree, I'll try to
start writing it in a few days.
> Am Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:4
Am Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:43:58 +0300
schrieb Eugen Minciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to add functionality for a 'suspend to disk' feature in
> Entrance, on Linux boxes. Right now, I'd like to allow this using
> uswsusp, which is the easiest to set up (it does require a very new
> Linux
11 matches
Mail list logo
