l items.
>maybe...
>
>
>Anyway, Yes, this time I need to check the possibility of using of
> elm_list again.
>
>(I do it first when I am free, then try it upstreamed if it can be done )
>
>
>I hope you consider that elm_list can cover the above case
&g
My comment are in-lined.
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 09:28 +, ChunEon Park wrote:
> Hi Tom, sorry for replying lately.
It's ok. :)
>
>
> The reason, a ctxpopup is openning really far from where user click,
> is...
>
> currently it is intended to be affected by finger size.
>
> Yes. I realize
Another comment: you still haven't replied regarding the issue with the
arrow and the ctxpopup opening really far from where you click.
Thanks,
Tom.
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 08:14 +, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Hey Hermet,
>
> My comments are inlined.
>
> On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 12:28 +, ChunEon Pa
Hey Hermet,
My comments are inlined.
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 12:28 +, ChunEon Park wrote:
>
> 1. If it looks ugly cause of the gray box for the disabled item,
>
> I will send a patch to back the design. I didn't think it's ugly and
> would not be matter.
Thanks :P
>
>
>
> 2. why it rem
Ok, after complaints in IRC:
to those of you who can't easily tell ugliness: the ugly one is the
right one. There are those ugly gray rects behind disabled items.
--
Tom.
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 11:53 +, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Attached is a screenshot of the main example of the ugl
One more thing:
I just looked at the code, and instead of using elm_list like before, we
moved to implementing items inside the ctxpopup. Any specific reason?
--
Tom.
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 12:00 +0200, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I just popped elementary_test open and went to the ctxpopup
