On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:03:34 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:25:05 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz said:
>
> > Should be r56254
>
> looking at the code... the bt makes no sense. when that struct is freed...
> it's removed from the infos list by ecore_con_server_i
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:25:05 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz said:
> Should be r56254
looking at the code... the bt makes no sense. when that struct is freed... it's
removed from the infos list by ecore_con_server_infos_del. unless the same
struct has been added TWICE... and i dont see that as it'd only
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 23:28:50 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:32:30 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz said:
>
> which commit?
>
> > Hey Raster,
> >
> > The following errors (when connecting to a server) are new
> > since you added that code which fixed the epoll bu
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:32:30 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz said:
which commit?
> Hey Raster,
>
> The following errors (when connecting to a server) are new
> since you added that code which fixed the epoll bug pre-1.0. It seems that
> the lookup data is attempting to clear its own pointer after the c
