> if you want to - deprecate the api and then remove it in a few weeks. :)
+1.
I think this is valid until elm reaches to 1.0.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 09:14:24 +0900 ChunEon Park said:
>
> i'm happy to deprecate it
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 09:14:24 +0900 ChunEon Park said:
i'm happy to deprecate it :) if you want to - deprecate the api and then
remove it in a few weeks. :)
>
> discomfitor!
>
> We don't know who are using which elm APIs even elm didn't reach the 1.0 yet.
>
> I don't wanna make them inconv
discomfitor!
We don't know who are using which elm APIs even elm didn't reach the 1.0 yet.
I don't wanna make them inconvenient.
Let's run together for the best moment!
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: "Mike Blumenkrantz"
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:25:06 +0900
ChunEon Park wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Yes, i guess it would be a bug and
> animator has a lack of functions for users (includes paused_get).
>
> However, ecore_animator is expanding it's functionalities,
> and elm_animator could be covered by elm_transit.
>
Hi.
Yes, i guess it would be a bug and
animator has a lack of functions for users (includes paused_get).
However, ecore_animator is expanding it's functionalities,
and elm_animator could be covered by elm_transit.
Hence, elm_animator should be deprecated at this time or soon unfortunatel