Re: [E-devel] evas premul changes

2006-09-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Nevertheless, yes grads can definately benefit from some > > optimizations :) > there we go - that's all i want to mention :) they aren't > "close to optimal" YET :) Well, patches are welcome you know :) Do not frett, o speedfreak.. I've just taken care of it.

Re: [E-devel] evas premul changes

2006-09-16 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:18:33 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: > On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 01:42:45PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > > sounds good - one thing i did notice - gradient fills are a lot slower than > > images... :) i noticed when cross-fading wallpapers @ 1600x1200 with > > gradie

Re: [E-devel] evas premul changes

2006-09-16 Thread brian . mattern
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 01:42:45PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > sounds good - one thing i did notice - gradient fills are a lot slower than > images... :) i noticed when cross-fading wallpapers @ 1600x1200 with gradient > bg's :) > The current edje implementation of grads does more recalcu

Re: [E-devel] evas premul changes

2006-09-16 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 07:21:09 GMT "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > Much ado about gradients, but hopefully all this will make > > > it easier to work with grads in current edje and otherwise. > > > > > > Comments...? > > > > sounds good - one thing i did notice - gradie

Re: [E-devel] evas premul changes

2006-09-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Much ado about gradients, but hopefully all this will make > > it easier to work with grads in current edje and otherwise. > > > > Comments...? > > sounds good - one thing i did notice - gradient fills are a lot > slower than images... :) i noticed when cross-fading wallpapers > @ 1600

Re: [E-devel] evas premul changes

2006-09-15 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:36:51 GMT "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > Since we're 'breaking' stuff and going over things -- I went > > > ahead and *removed* the current "evas_object_gradient_data_unset" > > > api function. > > > > > > Why..? Well, its functionality can be

Re: [E-devel] evas premul changes

2006-09-15 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:55:20 GMT "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > Just a note on the evas move-to-premul stuff. Some things > are taking me a bit more time than I had thought, so it looks like > I may not finish with it til the weekend.. we'll see. > > Let me give

Re: [E-devel] evas premul changes

2006-09-15 Thread Jason Tackaberry
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 06:55 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Much ado about gradients, but hopefully all this will make > it easier to work with grads in current edje and otherwise. Forgive me for chiming in when I haven't read the full thread nor grokked the context, but does any of your w

Re: [E-devel] evas premul changes

2006-09-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason writes: > > Much ado about gradients, but hopefully all this will make > > it easier to work with grads in current edje and otherwise. > > Forgive me for chiming in when I haven't read the full thread nor > grokked the context, but does any of your work allow being able > to set gra

Re: [E-devel] evas premul changes

2006-09-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Since we're 'breaking' stuff and going over things -- I went > > ahead and *removed* the current "evas_object_gradient_data_unset" > > api function. > > > > Why..? Well, its functionality can be obtained by setting > > new data/adata, or by the colors-clear api func (which will clear > >

Re: [E-devel] evas premul changes

2006-09-14 Thread brian . mattern
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:55:20AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Just a note on the evas move-to-premul stuff. Some things > are taking me a bit more time than I had thought, so it looks like > I may not finish with it til the weekend.. we'll see. > > Let me give a quick recap o