On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:11:43 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
said:
> while looking at the doc of UPX, i've found that lossless
> (de)compression library:
>
> http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/
>
> which says to compress better and to be faster decompression than
> >
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Thomas Gstädtner wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 20:15, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, David Seikel wrote:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
wrote:
while looking at the doc of UPX, i've found that lossless
(de)compression library:
http
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:54:41 +0200 Thomas Gstädtner
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 20:15, Vincent Torri
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, David Seikel wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> while looking at the doc of UPX, i've found
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 20:15, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, David Seikel wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
>> wrote:
>>
>>> while looking at the doc of UPX, i've found that lossless
>>> (de)compression library:
>>>
>>> http://www.oberhumer.com/open
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, David Seikel wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> wrote:
>
>> while looking at the doc of UPX, i've found that lossless
>> (de)compression library:
>>
>> http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/
>>
>> which says to compress better and to be faste
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
wrote:
> while looking at the doc of UPX, i've found that lossless
> (de)compression library:
>
> http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/
>
> which says to compress better and to be faster decompression than
> zlib.
>
> There is no compa
