On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Christopher Michael
wrote:
> On 04/08/2010 09:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Christopher Michael
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I noticed while looking through the code of the Modules Dialog, that we
>>> are using "assert" in some
On 04/08/2010 09:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Christopher Michael
> wrote:
>> I noticed while looking through the code of the Modules Dialog, that we
>> are using "assert" in some places there. I don't think this is such a
>> good idea :( Do we really w
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Christopher Michael
wrote:
> I noticed while looking through the code of the Modules Dialog, that we
> are using "assert" in some places there. I don't think this is such a
> good idea :( Do we really want the whole window manager terminating on
> the off chance tha
Gustavo wrote:
> dropshadow is broken?
>
no, but it is lame :-P
>> No way man! Dropshadow is neat.
>>
>
> first time I saw it, before composite managers where born, I said
> "cool", but nowadays it's very lame, even windows do proper shadows!
> :-
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:12:51 +0200 Vincent Pomageot
said:
> Trying to optimize the usability for small screen can indeed improve user
> experience with larger screen.
well i am trying to have the dialogs also size up nicely - in the case of
wallpaper this works well - some others just wont size
Trying to optimize the usability for small screen can indeed improve user
experience with larger screen.
> yes. you will need to rebuild modules. the modules in E-MODULES-EXTRa have
> been
> fixed to pick up the release # from e and install correctly. now modules
> (and
> libs) have versioned r
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:19:53 +0200 Vincent Pomageot
said:
> Hi devs !
>
> Good things first:
> I've give a new try to the wallpaper 2 module after having read a post by
> raster on the openmoko mailing list, and following a link to a beautiful
> video showing its capacities.
> I have to say that
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:03:06 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:47:38 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> > said:
>> >
>> >> Hello all,
>> >>
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:03:06 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:47:38 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
> >
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I think that some modules should be disabled, at least at runtim
2009/4/20 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Toma wrote:
>> 2009/4/20 Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy :
>>> I hope you don't disable dropshadow... Even if it's lame... ;)
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 06:03:06PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sun, Apr 19, 200
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Toma wrote:
> 2009/4/20 Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy :
>> I hope you don't disable dropshadow... Even if it's lame... ;)
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 06:03:06PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Carsten Haitzler
>>> wrote:
2009/4/20 Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy :
> I hope you don't disable dropshadow... Even if it's lame... ;)
>
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 06:03:06PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:47:38 -0300 Gustavo Sverz
I hope you don't disable dropshadow... Even if it's lame... ;)
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 06:03:06PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:47:38 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
> >
> >> Hello all,
> >
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 06:03:06PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote :
> > n.b. - i'd disable in config profile, not build... ? new users will lose
> > them -
> > old users keep what they have.
>
> ok, I'd rather disable their build, but just in profiles is fine.
>
I agree with raster. Unle
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:47:38 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I think that some modules should be disabled, at least at runtime, by
>> default. Things like change colors and fonts, drop shadows and few
>> other
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:47:38 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> Hello all,
>
> I think that some modules should be disabled, at least at runtime, by
> default. Things like change colors and fonts, drop shadows and few
> others. What do you think? If you know of broken modules, then we can
>
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:44:50 -0600 "Hawkwind " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> I've noticed in the recent days after an update that *Modules* is nolonger an
> option in the menu. I do realise that it is now part of theConfiguration
> Panel which is nice. However, it was so much easier tobe able to
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 09:44:50 -0600, Hawkwind wrote:
> I've noticed in the recent days after an update that *Modules* is no
> longer an option in the menu. I do realise that it is now part of the
> Configuration Panel which is nice. However, it was so much easier to
> be able to left click, go
Hawkwind , il 21/12/2005 04:44, scrisse:
> I've noticed in the recent days after an update that *Modules* is no
> longer an option in the menu. I do realise that it is now part of the
> Configuration Panel which is nice. However, it was so much easier to
> be able to left click, go to modules and
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:30:38 +1100 Daniel Kasak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Hi all.
>
> I have a suggestion for the modules configuration panel.
>
> The current approach is to have the 'advanced' panel for loading /
> unloading modules, and the 'basic' panel for enabling / disabling
> modul
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 13:09:16 + Felix Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:53:38 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 06:19:37 + Felix Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > > So, why are modules part of th
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:53:38 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 06:19:37 + Felix Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > So, why are modules part of the desktop?
> > Why was this design choice made?
> >
> > One alternative I could thin
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 06:19:37 +
Felix Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bubbled:
> Hello E developers,
>
> I have been using E17 for quite some time now, and I am really
> impressed with your work. I wonder, however, about one design
> choice you made and would like to know your reasons.
>
> Modules
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 06:19:37 + Felix Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hello E developers,
>
> I have been using E17 for quite some time now, and I am really
> impressed with your work. I wonder, however, about one design
> choice you made and would like to know your reasons.
>
> Modules
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 01:58:23 +0300 Hisham Mardam Bey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Hello folks,
>
> Valtteri (vrln) told me that the notes module isnt working properly.
> It doesnt accept keyboard input. After looking into the issue, it has
> become apparent to me that this stopped working around
25 matches
Mail list logo
