JC Wong wrote:
Log Message:
>> A pseudo-transparency support hack.
Any idea how to test out this thing? I can't see any window Menu's
setting for that. Thanks.
OK, a few notes on this:
Pseudo-transparent items must be configured in the theme files.
So, first of all, everything should work as u
On Saturday, 22 November 2003, at 20:17:34 (-0500),
Laurence J. Lane wrote:
> A user mentioned this a while ago. The fix works for me and
> backported quite easily.
>
> Release 0.9.3 when you get a chance.
>
> Thanks. Have a nice day.
That should happen fairly soon. The sooner I get opinions o
> That should happen fairly soon. The sooner I get opinions on the new
> backgrounds, the sooner I release. :)
they look great to me. will those be in addition to the current set of
backgrounds or as a replacement? the reason i ask is, if they're
additions, the tiled pix submenu will get way
On Monday, 29 December 2003, at 13:45:51 (-0500),
Trey Gruel wrote:
> they look great to me. will those be in addition to the current set
> of backgrounds or as a replacement? the reason i ask is, if they're
> additions, the tiled pix submenu will get way too long unless
> subgroups are created.
Michael Jennings wrote:
>On Saturday, 22 November 2003, at 20:17:34 (-0500),
>Laurence J. Lane wrote:
>
>
>
>>A user mentioned this a while ago. The fix works for me and
>>backported quite easily.
>>
>>Release 0.9.3 when you get a chance.
>>
>>Thanks. Have a nice day.
>>
>>
>
>That should ha
On Monday, 29 December 2003, at 14:45:55 (-0500),
Hall Stevenson wrote:
> Backgrounds for Eterm ?? What's that ?? I always use
> transparency :-)
Then see how they look as desktop backgrounds. :P
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1,
* Trey Gruel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > That should happen fairly soon. The sooner I get opinions on the new
> > backgrounds, the sooner I release. :)
>
> they look great to me. will those be in addition to the current set of
> backgrounds or as a replacement? the reason i ask is, if they'
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 01:53:18PM -0600, Corey Donohoe wrote:
> This submenu is generated how?
Maybe Etbg_update_list.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign
> > they look great to me. will those be in addition to the current set
> > of backgrounds or as a replacement? the reason i ask is, if they're
> > additions, the tiled pix submenu will get way too long unless
> > subgroups are created.
>
> I haven't entirely decided. The 0*.jpg ones are defini
On Monday, 29 December 2003, at 15:01:26 (-0500),
Trey Gruel wrote:
> personally, i nuke about half of them from the default install.
> mainly the ones that i consider too bright or too busy (i seem to
> recal one with a ship in a previous release). my concern about the
> size of the submenus was
> > they look great to me. will those be in addition to the current set of
> > backgrounds or as a replacement? the reason i ask is, if they're
> > additions, the tiled pix submenu will get way too long unless
> > subgroups are created.
> This submenu is generated how? I added a ton of images
> > personally, i nuke about half of them from the default install.
> > mainly the ones that i consider too bright or too busy (i seem to
> > recal one with a ship in a previous release). my concern about the
> > size of the submenus was mostly for those who don't.
>
> I was hoping for some speci
On Mon 29 Dec 2003, Nathan Sullivan wrote:
> first note - my PATH contains /usr/local/e17/bin, and all libs are built
> with ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr/local/e17. if rebuilding a lib, just
> make uninstall, make distclean, and ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/e17
>
> according to cvsnotes.html, a
13 matches
Mail list logo
