Re: [E-devel] CVS access

2005-02-08 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: i guess we could :) just a few things. your first (big patch) adds features not on the mini-freeze todo list (button bindings) - it'd be good to discuss this first and hear your plans on how to tackle it. remember we likely have discussed things and designs (

[E-devel] [PATCH] e

2005-02-08 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
Hi! Read that e_object_del should be used instead of e_object_unref. These fixes should be right. The objects are created in the .c file, and deleted there. Sebastian Index: e/src/bin/e_module.c === RCS file: /cvsroot/enlightenment/

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] e

2005-02-08 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 12:38:00 +0100 Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Hi! > > Read that e_object_del should be used instead of e_object_unref. These > fixes should be right. The objects are created in the .c file, and > deleted there. in many, but not

[E-devel] Re: E CVS: libs/ecore raster

2005-02-08 Thread Tilman Sauerbeck
enlightenment-cvs@lists.sourceforge.net [2005-02-07 19:15]: > Enlightenment CVS committal > > Author : raster > Project : e17 > Module : libs/ecore > > Modified Files: > ecore_signal.c > > Log Message: > > dont really need sigrt stuff.. conflicites... > > [snip] > +/* lets not use t

Re: [E-devel] Re: enlightenment-cvs digest, Vol 1 #3130 - 3 msgs

2005-02-08 Thread Kim Woelders
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:18:35 PST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: +It is now possible to execute scripts on startup and/or restart. Use +$ eesh set misc.session.cmd_init

Re: [E-devel] Re: E CVS: libs/ecore raster

2005-02-08 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:17:35 +0100 Tilman Sauerbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > enlightenment-cvs@lists.sourceforge.net [2005-02-07 19:15]: > > Enlightenment CVS committal > > > > Author : raster > > Project : e17 > > Module : libs/ecore > > > > Modified Fil

Re: [E-devel] Re: enlightenment-cvs digest, Vol 1 #3130 - 3 msgs

2005-02-08 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:07:47 +0100, Kim Woelders said: > Yeah, that was somewhat ambiguous. I hope it's more clear now :) Yeah, that looks better.. ;) pgpSVaIMRY9vd.pgp Description: PGP signature