Re: [E-devel] where are the flame and snow modules in DR17 cvs?

2005-04-22 Thread Didier Casse
Thanks to Dale, Adam and Chady for the many reply. ;-) -- With kind regards, Didier. --- Didier F.B Casse | PhD candidate | LiMiNT Beamline Singapore Synchrotron Light Source (SSLS), 5 Research Link, Singapore 117603 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Web: http://ssls.nus.edu.sg | GPG Key 1024D/B3C57D01

Re: [E-devel] where are the flame and snow modules in DR17 cvs?

2005-04-22 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:40:38 +0800 Didier Casse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Hi! > I pulled out the tree e17/apps/e again and noted that the > modules flame and snow are missing. The src/modules/flame and > src/modules/snow firectories are there but the e_mod_main.* are >

Re: [E-devel] Perl Bindings

2005-04-22 Thread Simon Wistow
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 06:34:05AM +1200, Dale Anderson said: > They appear to be gathering dust nicely .. Image::Imlib2 on CPAAN just (last Friday) got updated to 1.07 Fri Apr 15 11:57:47 BST 2005 - Add clone, sharpen and blur (thanks to Christian Hansen) --

Re: [E-devel] Perl Bindings

2005-04-22 Thread Dale Anderson
I was refering to the bindings in cvs misc . Dale. On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 20:50, you wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 06:34:05AM +1200, Dale Anderson said: > > They appear to be gathering dust nicely .. > > Image::Imlib2 on CPAAN just (last Friday) got updated to > > 1.07 Fri Apr 15 11:57:47 BS

Re: [E-devel] Logging for #edevelop

2005-04-22 Thread gimpel
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 20:38:20 +0200 Tilman Sauerbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tilman Sauerbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-22 19:12]: > > What do you think? Should we request logging for #edevelop with that > > project? Objections? > > <@ RbdPngn> tilman: I think we should just go ahead with

Re: [E-devel] Logging for #edevelop

2005-04-22 Thread Nathan Ingersoll
Looks like a good way to go to me. Especially since they provide plaintext downloads of specific days. We could setup a cronjob to keep backups of the daily discussion in case the site becomes unavailable at some point. On 4/22/05, Tilman Sauerbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > some week

Re: [E-devel] Logging for #edevelop

2005-04-22 Thread Tilman Sauerbeck
Tilman Sauerbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-22 19:12]: > What do you think? Should we request logging for #edevelop with that > project? Objections? <@ RbdPngn> tilman: I think we should just go ahead with that bot <@ RbdPngn> if someone objects, they'll speak up <@ tilman> RbdPngn: anyway,

[E-devel] Logging for #edevelop

2005-04-22 Thread Tilman Sauerbeck
Hi guys, some weeks ago, Nathan proposed to add a logging bot to #edevelop. One benefit of this would be that we can tell users to go look for answers to common questions there ;D I've stumbled across http://loglibrary.com/ recently, and it looks quite good. What do you think? Should we request l