Nikolas Arend wrote:
> Nikolas Arend wrote:
>
>> Christopher Michael wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Sounds great :) Can you actually attach the patches tho? :) When I save
>>> attachments, all I get is the tomcat message :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I did attach them, even the first time. The
Hey Guys,
Sorry I've been away for so long. I'm still here, just in hiding. I
just wanted to chime in that I am fully willing to redo the site and do
what needs to be done to get that horrible pile of crap (90% of which I
wrote and hasn't been changing in 2+ years) fixed. I've made it clear
o
Nikolas Arend wrote:
> So, uhm, does anybody have an opinion about it? Are there any problems
> with the patch, with applying it or code-wise? Some feedback would be
> appreciated. ;-)
I have your original emails saved in my Inbox. I have not had the time
to try and get them out of the email to
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006, at 10:51:36 (-0700),
Ben Rockwood wrote:
> I've made it clear over the years that so long as we're using
> Rectang XSM I won't touch the site. I used it a couple of times and
> the frustration, speed, and capabilities of XSM are totally
> inexcusable. I have a gr
Nikolas Arend wrote:
>>> I just tried to apply this patch, but I'm getting a message "Only
>>> garbage was found in the patch input."
>>>
>>> Can you resend this as a diff for each file seperatly? Makes it much
>>> easier for me.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> dh
Committed to cvs, thanks :)
dh
---
Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Wednesday, 20 September 2006, at 10:51:36 (-0700),
> Ben Rockwood wrote:
>
>
>> I've made it clear over the years that so long as we're using
>> Rectang XSM I won't touch the site. I used it a couple of times and
>> the frustration, speed, and capabilities of XSM ar
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006, at 16:59:10 (-0700),
Ben Rockwood wrote:
> 1) Since moving to XSM updates have almost complete stopped. The
> changes in the last 2 years are all trivial. (Minus the redesign work.)
I'm trying to forget the past transgressions that may have occurred
and focus on
I don't know which xsm version e.org runs, nor if the slowness is
because of the machine. But as i use xsm for the get-e.org maintaince i
can say that is has been speeded up a lot since my first contact one year ago.
30 minutes for a simple news post is really not acceptable - but on
get-e.org it i
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:59:10 -0700 Ben Rockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
well the plan for now is dependent on when e.org moves.
what i have noticed is we have a fairly big "i dont like xsm" camp. the biggest
complaints are ui and speed. frankly adding a news item should take no more
than 5 s
